Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — kj01a

kj01a

HN member
Joined
Thu, Dec 19, 2013, 9:47 PM UTC
HN karma
75
Public activity
77 items

About kj01a

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #17306902

    I'm sure that's exactly what happened, and Zoe Quinn would never lie, no sir.

  2. comment
    Comment #17306891

    Or... you could not pay your committee so they're not incentivized to find positive results.

  3. comment
    Comment #17306850

    > no evidence that anybody reviewed her after she slept with them > one appears to be with a reviewer Wat

  4. comment
    Comment #17306721

    Exactly, all we need to do is give women power over men and sexual harassment won't exist anymore.

  5. comment
    Comment #17306711

    I believe this study was done with purely an interest in the facts and not a political agenda.

  6. comment
    Comment #16637753

    Well now I'm confused, is that not what their talking about in this article?

  7. comment
    Comment #16569005

    Only black people museums can have black people things. Racist bullshit.

  8. comment
    Comment #16274220

    Did iOS get rid of the "turn off banner notifications," or whatever it's called, in settings?

  9. comment
    Comment #13593604

    Replied via email.

  10. comment
    Comment #13592575

    Well, I would have deleted my "rabid," "aggressive," and "unsubstantive" comments, but apparently you've decided your users don't deserve the right to retract statements when they …

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #13583199

    Can I ask why I'm being singled out here? Edit: And why can't I post anymore?

  13. comment
    Comment #13582112

    No system is 100% efficient. What's your point?

  14. comment
  15. comment
  16. comment
    Comment #13582045

    When it comes to obesity the victim is to blame. >I think it'd be a lot more challenging for someone to be obese with the same caloric amount of avocados than cheetos, for example …

  17. comment
    Comment #13580225

    No one is saying calorie intake should be constant.

  18. comment
    Comment #13580196

    The fact that your body can change the number of calories it burn disproves nothing. For example, the more weight you lose the fewer calories you burn, thus your calorie intake mus…

  19. comment
    Comment #13579730

    That paper is defining a calorie as the chemical make up of a particular macronutrient. Which is wrong. A calorie is a unit of measure of energy. Plus, if something violated a law …

  20. comment
    Comment #13579674

    The change in internal energy is negligible. The only exception is medical disorder. If you want to lose weight and you are not, eat less. If the amount you eat goes below say 1200…

  21. comment
    Comment #13579640

    Either thermodynamics is wrong, or you are undisciplined. Which do you think is more likely?

  22. comment
    Comment #13579599

    It's not helpful because some food are more calorie dense than others? How does that make sense?

  23. comment
    Comment #13579553

    No wonder the robots decided to use us for batteries.

  24. comment
    Comment #13579538

    >Calories in, calories out is not the golden rule, and this has been scientifically proven false. No. If the laws of thermodynamics had been proven false, we would have heard of it…

  25. comment
    Comment #13567989

    >Am I really that much of an outlier? No. Most people just live. They go to work, they go home, they sleep, maybe have a few drinks on the weekends, but their lives are not driven …