Viewing profile — kj01a
kj01a
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Dec 19, 2013, 9:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 75
- Public activity
- 77 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kj01a
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17306902
I'm sure that's exactly what happened, and Zoe Quinn would never lie, no sir.
-
comment
Comment #17306891
Or... you could not pay your committee so they're not incentivized to find positive results.
-
comment
Comment #17306850
> no evidence that anybody reviewed her after she slept with them > one appears to be with a reviewer Wat
-
comment
Comment #17306721
Exactly, all we need to do is give women power over men and sexual harassment won't exist anymore.
-
comment
Comment #17306711
I believe this study was done with purely an interest in the facts and not a political agenda.
-
comment
Comment #16637753
Well now I'm confused, is that not what their talking about in this article?
-
comment
Comment #16569005
Only black people museums can have black people things. Racist bullshit.
-
comment
Comment #16274220
Did iOS get rid of the "turn off banner notifications," or whatever it's called, in settings?
-
comment
Comment #13593604
Replied via email.
-
comment
Comment #13592575
Well, I would have deleted my "rabid," "aggressive," and "unsubstantive" comments, but apparently you've decided your users don't deserve the right to retract statements when they …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #13583199
Can I ask why I'm being singled out here? Edit: And why can't I post anymore?
-
comment
Comment #13582112
No system is 100% efficient. What's your point?
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #13582045
When it comes to obesity the victim is to blame. >I think it'd be a lot more challenging for someone to be obese with the same caloric amount of avocados than cheetos, for example …
-
comment
Comment #13580225
No one is saying calorie intake should be constant.
-
comment
Comment #13580196
The fact that your body can change the number of calories it burn disproves nothing. For example, the more weight you lose the fewer calories you burn, thus your calorie intake mus…
-
comment
Comment #13579730
That paper is defining a calorie as the chemical make up of a particular macronutrient. Which is wrong. A calorie is a unit of measure of energy. Plus, if something violated a law …
-
comment
Comment #13579674
The change in internal energy is negligible. The only exception is medical disorder. If you want to lose weight and you are not, eat less. If the amount you eat goes below say 1200…
-
comment
Comment #13579640
Either thermodynamics is wrong, or you are undisciplined. Which do you think is more likely?
-
comment
Comment #13579599
It's not helpful because some food are more calorie dense than others? How does that make sense?
-
comment
Comment #13579553
No wonder the robots decided to use us for batteries.
-
comment
Comment #13579538
>Calories in, calories out is not the golden rule, and this has been scientifically proven false. No. If the laws of thermodynamics had been proven false, we would have heard of it…
-
comment
Comment #13567989
>Am I really that much of an outlier? No. Most people just live. They go to work, they go home, they sleep, maybe have a few drinks on the weekends, but their lives are not driven …