Viewing profile — kingkilr
kingkilr
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jul 06, 2009, 3:47 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,623
- Public activity
- 811 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kingkilr
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47274292
[Work at Anthropic, used to work at Mozilla.] Firefox has never required a full chain exploit in order to consider something a vulnerability. A large proportion of disclosed Firefo…
-
comment
Comment #44968320
(pyca/cryptography dev here) As Steve notes, Rust does support s390x. Even prior to shipping Rust code, we never tested or claimed to support s390x. If there's genuine interest in …
-
comment
Comment #43405800
RealPage was DoJ. As was the Google search litigation where DoJ proposed Google divest Chrome. Which is by way of saying, the FTC and Chair Khan were not responsible for those.
-
comment
Comment #42576212
I would strongly implore people not to follow the example this post suggests, and write code that relies on this monotonicity. The reason for this is simple: the documentation does…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #33333744
Since last year's AMG case in the Supreme Court, the FTC is not authorized to seek monetary relief in these cases. The FTC can seek monetary relief if this order is violated.
-
comment
Comment #26926460
I don't know Brett super well so I can't speak to the rest of his background, but it's not correct that the Obama admin asked him to take over DDS. DDS's founding head was Chris Ly…
-
comment
Comment #24730165
While I don't love the proliferation of dependencies, from a risk perspective the raw number of dependencies isn't always the right metric. Looking at the authors and publishers nu…
-
comment
Comment #24729992
I think it's fair to say that this work is quite likely to qualify :-)
-
comment
Comment #24729822
Rust has a few interlocking behaviors that provide its memory safety, a few of the most important are: - The borrow checker enforces mutable XOR shared references. - The compiler d…
-
comment
Comment #24729396
Sure you can. First, in a philosophical sense: pointers and x86 CPUs are real, ultimately any safe abstraction must be built on unsafe primitives. The ability and need to do that a…
-
comment
Comment #24729356
I don't have any data on exploitability, but 19 of the last 22 vulnerabilities (since 2018) have C-induced memory unsafety as a cause: https://curl.haxx.se/docs/security.html
- story
-
comment
Comment #23968844
It's a great question! a) It being acceptable to upstream is mandatory to receive a bounty, so a starting point might be: pick projects whose maintainers are sick of dealing with A…
-
comment
Comment #23968266
Lots of drivers, network protocols, etc. in the kernel, and they're most of the attack surface -- not the scheduler :-) We have to approach this as a question of how, not if. When …
-
comment
Comment #23968051
The kernel maintainers have actively expressed interest in having upstream support for writing kernel modules in Rust!
-
comment
Comment #23967917
Those of us who organized this both have a long history of involvement in open source. If we have even an iota of this becoming a problem, we will a) be incredibly saddened, b) fig…
-
comment
Comment #23967827
One of the folks behind the bounty here. Happy to answer questions.
- story
-
comment
Comment #22342352
(Former Firefox Security Engineer) I suspect it's because Firefox exploits have looked the same for the last several years -- there has not been a lot of novelty required to implem…
-
comment
Comment #20526938
As far as we know the entire kernel for both is memory unsafe. It's not clear to me how much Swift is in use internally for things besides apps (e.g. is there a future where Window…
- story
-
comment
Comment #19493082
29/51 appear to be memory unsafety https://twitter.com/LazyFishBarrel/status/111032101282489958...
- story