Viewing profile — keyvank
keyvank
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Apr 06, 2017, 1:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 169
- Public activity
- 59 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About keyvank
Read my book: https://github.com/keyvank/tsp
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #44701606
Almost correct! Though the system consists of 2 tokens. BETH which is 1:1 ERC-20 receipt of burnt ETH, and WORM which has a limited cap & limited emission of 50 WORM per 30 minutes…
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #42446047
nice job! now it's time for the prover part :)
-
story
Show HN: Hacker News Clone for Crypto
I missed smth very similar to hackernews, but more focused on crypto, so I built one :)
-
comment
Comment #42382862
So glad you liked it!
-
story
Show HN: Book on writing many kind of cool software from scratch
Still incomplete, but WIP!
-
comment
Comment #42353699
wow, i envy you! :) i have been working on a really simple self-compiling C compiler for some time, was wondering if you are interested in adding it to your OS haha. but if GCC wor…
-
comment
Comment #42348528
can you compile and run smth like gcc in your OS?
-
comment
Comment #42338856
have done that already :(
-
comment
Comment #42334449
that’s why i love HN. tnx for the links!
-
story
Ask HN: Looking for a new hobby programming project to start
i like building stuff that makes me learn something. I mean stuff like ray tracers, operating systems, compilers and etc. suggestions?
- story
-
comment
Comment #42321134
the asms should be identical, so the binaries should be identical too, unless the linker is undeterministic
-
comment
Comment #42317936
perfect explanation, tnx!
-
comment
Comment #42316250
i think it just supports smth like 70% of C. I didn't bother supporting floating-point operators, or arrays (I mean, malloc and pointers are fine) or etc. I just wanted smth small …
-
comment
Comment #42316237
i learnt that building a c compiler isn't that hard, just takes time :)
-
comment
Comment #42316225
thanks man! yes that makes sense. unfortunately 30cc is not able to compile that syntax, and will probably give type-checker errors when passing a void* to pointer of another type.…
-
comment
Comment #42315313
Thanks! The third step proves that the assembly code generated by the second-step compiler is valid even when compiling a big C project.
-
comment
Comment #42312758
tnx!