Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — kevinventullo

kevinventullo

HN member
Joined
Fri, Nov 16, 2018, 5:58 AM UTC
HN karma
4,311
Public activity
1,336 items

About kevinventullo

EM at Google

https://kevinventullo.com/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinventullo/

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. comment
  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #45206581

    [flagged]

  5. comment
    Comment #45193092

    I thought charter schools and public schools received the same $/student.

  6. comment
    Comment #45141154

    What’s funny is the jerky animation actually communicates so much more than the smooth animation.

  7. comment
    Comment #45133363

    I attended high school in the US in the early 00’s and cell phones were absolutely banned from classrooms. You could keep them in your locker and use them between classes, but that…

  8. comment
    Comment #45130680

    FWIW there is a new-ish kind of intermediate genre between classic LAN/ranked multiplayer and single player, which is the whole “survival” genre. Generally speaking, they can be pl…

  9. comment
    Comment #45031669

    Basically anything that requires a massively parallel computation on undeterminable states that are only clear in hindsight. From https://scottaaronson.blog/ : “If you take nothing…

  10. comment
    Comment #45014357

    What’s the best choice of free desktop PDF Viewer/Editor these days (any OS)? On Windows I’ve been using PDF-XChange for a decade or so now, but curious if better alternatives have…

  11. comment
    Comment #44989241

    “Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos”

  12. comment
    Comment #44977424

    That’s a fair point. But it greatly limits the scope of human-introduced error. I think already for FLT, the surface area for error in the kernel and in axiom translation is substa…

  13. comment
    Comment #44975413

    You need at least 45 guesses since 2^44 < 16!

  14. comment
    Comment #44969075

    I contend it is the only way to move forward on the goal of “automating” mathematics. Although we’ve seen natural language approaches do well at IMO, the human effort required to v…

  15. comment
    Comment #44915589

    Caveat: I am not an expert, so this is a semi-educated guess. I imagine it would depend on whether DINOv3 captures the information of whether a given person is in the image, which …

  16. comment
    Comment #44906182

    To elaborate, this is a foundation model. This basically means it can take an arbitrary image and map it to a high dimensional space H in which ~arbitrary characteristics become mu…

  17. comment
    Comment #44904077

    Perhaps you can do some pre-processing before the LLM sees it, e.g. replacing every instance of “kill” with “NorwegianDudeGameKill”, and providing the specific context of what the …

  18. comment
    Comment #44903874

    As I understand it, the most effective small models are synthesized from larger models.

  19. comment
    Comment #44901591

    The rejection might also be random and out of your control. E.g. if they already filled the position or the higher-ups decided to save costs by taking back open headcount. Frustrat…

  20. comment
    Comment #44892409

    Is anyone else getting tired of these articles? “Area man who had poor judgement ten years ago now has both poor judgement and access to chatbots”

  21. comment
    Comment #44885170

    In some sense, the program itself is a ~512 byte compression of an infinite stream of bytes.

  22. comment
    Comment #44833740

    The benefits have just not been that wide ranging to the average person I think you might be underestimating how many non-technical people are using LLM’s daily.

  23. comment
    Comment #44833685

    Won’t you get margin called if the stock goes up in the meantime?

  24. comment
    Comment #44833130

    Is anything stopping private philanthropy from funding science today? Generally speaking it is in the government’s interest to support fundamental scientific research.

  25. comment
    Comment #44829251

    I think “PhD level knowledge” is probably a more meaningful and accurate phrase.