Viewing profile — kevinak
kevinak
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 03, 2020, 5:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,297
- Public activity
- 326 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kevinak
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48780719
Very cool! I like it! What about using Nostr relays to also back up your data passwords? I built a library called Tablinum around this idea. Local first but backed up to Nostr rela…
-
comment
Comment #48744849
That's a lot of information about something that does not really matter in practice. It's not until ew get to the very end of your comment that we get to the actually relevant part…
-
comment
Comment #48738846
Where are your rotation and signing keys stored? Who can access them? Talking here about the majority case.
-
comment
Comment #48738260
Nope. When I’m talking about identity I’m speaking strictly of the keys that sign your messages and the pub key derived from it. In every other cryptographic system that is your id…
-
comment
Comment #48736390
That’s a very narrow definition of decentralisation. In any case - both atproto and fediverse are massively centralised compared to something like Nostr, and it’s not even close. T…
-
comment
Comment #48735193
You won’t have decentralisation on Atproto because the protocol itself incentivises centralisation.
-
comment
Comment #48622610
The end of the article explains why this isn’t necessarily better than a centralised service. Yes - you can self host but no one (yes, there a few exceptions) does in practice. You…
-
comment
Comment #48622308
The point of the article is that 99.9% of users will not take custodial control of their identity - not that they can’t.
-
comment
Comment #48622180
Yes - the trade off is centralisation.
-
comment
Comment #48622168
Atproto is not decentralised, it’s faux decentralised. You can technically be sovereign, but incentives and the way things have been done results in massive centralisation - 99.9% …
-
comment
Comment #48622076
It’s great that tings like this exist but as long as this is how identities work on ATProto it’s unfortunately going to be a niche thing.
-
comment
Comment #48621811
You can just read the documentation: https://atproto.com/guides/overview#account-portability “The signing key is entrusted to the PDS so that it can manage the user's data, but rot…
-
comment
Comment #48621773
Yes you can but the vast majority don’t, and that is what matters. When Bluesky goes rogue because of profitability issues or VC pressure, the vast vast majority of users lose thei…
-
comment
Comment #48621742
Correct, but it’s not decentralized in any meaningful way, which is what a lot of ATProto proponents want you to believe. No one (not literally of course) self hosts their PDS. Lik…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47728937
Looking at the studies on the site I’m only seeing comparisons vs placebo and activated charcoal - why not compare to non modified regular beta glucan that is in most oats?
-
comment
Comment #47605737
Not parent but I wrote an article about how PDSs (the thing that hosts your data) control your signing and rotation keys. It's technically possible to self-host but as always, the …
-
comment
Comment #47562436
There is - https://flotilla.social/
-
comment
Comment #47562418
Yes. Here are some specifications that describe it: https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/17.md and https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/59.md
-
comment
Comment #47562411
So if a user is banned from their PDS and they haven't backed up their keys, the community is screwed? That seems like a pretty big flaw.
-
comment
Comment #47335900
Yep! People in the Bitcoin space have been screaming at the top of their lungs about this for decades at this point, but it's hard to work against the marketing machine that comes …
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47214781
On the other hand, shining a light on things that are not what they seem is very good, which is what I tried to do.
-
comment
Comment #47210728
I did, we just have different views of what decentralized means.