Viewing profile — keonix

It would not be illegal based on fair use (though you have to be careful there also), but if you try to regurgiate large portions of the book then it would be. And we do know that …

If I regurgiate something I read in copyrighted book without proper license that also would be theft, no distinction there. I'm not distributing my brain, at least same (but probab…

> with or without finetuning? With, but it's still bonkers that it works so well >Also is there a practical motivation for creating them? You could get in-between model sizes (like…

Wait until you hear about frankenmodels. You rip parts of one model (often attention heads) and transplant them in another and somehow that produces coherent results! Witchcraft ht…

I assume it's because such large context takes lots of memory, so you might as well have smarter model if you are not gonna fit in small vram anyway

Mistral 7B ~ 8 GiB StableLM 3B ~4 GiB You could go even lower with smaller quantization if necessary. I personally wouldn't use anything smaller than 7B and Mistral already pushing…

For what it's worth, I think OP has a point in showing inconsistencies in your logic

That's disingenuous. You provided link to a legal framework, but not any use of it. Your source doesn't even mention a single delivery under this act. > Can you provide a source fo…

> US isn't donating weapons to Ukraine, it's leasing them Could you kindly support your statement with the source? AFAIK most aid provided to Ukraine is not under lend-lease but do…

IIRC temperature is proportional to velocity squared so increase in simulation speed will result in squared increase in temperature. But even if we account for that we are not deal…

> So it’s completely subjective to you No? My prediction holds even if I didn't exist. > not anywhere near the testable physics that I was looking for. And now you are moving the g…

Sure! It's just a classification of events that each person has. Testible prediction? Socially close people will have similar classifications as opposed to randomly chosen ones (I …

GPL restricts only developers. As an end user restrictions don't even apply to you

Nothing changes, it is still a violation

> western Europe or the US. Why would we care about anyone not in the richest countries. It's not like they need security by default to not become another botnet and DDoS Europe or…

Make it so decoding feasible only using some consumer hardware not usually found in servers, but omnipresent on consumer devices. GPU for example

If you buy from reseller they have no way to correlate payment details to search queries. With subscription, however, service provider have your payment details and knows everythin…

You could sell tokens that get used up after each search or expire after certain amount of time since first use. Browser extension could store tokens and provide them to website as…

They do actually restrict issuer in most cases. Linus can't just strip Linux of other developers parts because they are tightly interconnected. He could relicense 30 year old versi…

Patents also preserve knowledge in publicly accessible and well documented form. Without patents the only option to recoup investment in R&D would be to make innovations a trade se…

Sure it is, you brain is not software though

I assume the code is a derivative work of training data because given different data code would be also different (neuron weights)

To build a browser you don't need a verbatim GPL code, so it's not a derivative work in the same sense copilot is. Stackoverflow on the other hand is much trickier question...

If the training set contains verbatim (A)GPL code does this mean that Copilot also should be distributed by Microsoft under GPL? Because without it Copilot (as it is distributed by…

Oh boy, that was a fun thread to read! Thanks for a laugh at GP expense