Viewing profile — kenshaw
kenshaw
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 06, 2014, 11:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 513
- Public activity
- 123 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kenshaw
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44641727
I encountered this while trying to issue a new certificate for a service. As a temporary fix, started using ZeroSSL which conveniently also supports the ACME protocol. While not a …
- story
-
comment
Comment #32892452
Thanks, appreciate the package. I submitted a PR as I was also looking for a Go package similar to this, and wanted to make using this as a library a bit easier. I plan on using th…
-
comment
Comment #28817624
discord.
-
comment
Comment #28478145
I'm the author of xo. I appreciate the reference here, but that's not really what xo does. It generates all boilerplate for you directly based on whatever is defined by the databas…
-
comment
Comment #28478118
That's cool. As per the other comment, you should share it with the community.
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #26375245
A long overdue release. General bug fixes, \d* commands, new database support, and a native Oracle driver.
- story
-
comment
Comment #21487891
Foreign keys should definitely be used in most schema designs. While I can agree that they are problematic when doing a schema migration, a schema migration would only happen "very…
-
comment
Comment #20589793
I disagree, and history does not show this to be true. We have been more fickle when it comes to instant messengers than almost any other technology on the face of the planet (pun …
-
comment
Comment #20589478
I appreciate your response, and will give you the benefit of doubt -- however this is in conflict with what a superficial reading of Schneiner's article suggests. Reading the repor…
-
comment
Comment #18945862
Yes, I understand how this would be done. It's a design philosophy. If you'd like Gunk to support "oneof", we're open to Pull Requests!
-
comment
Comment #18945740
Gunk is a frontend to protoc. If one needs to use "oneof", it's still possible to just define it in a .proto file. Gunk interoperates cleanly with both .proto and .gunk files.
-
comment
Comment #18945727
lowmagnet more or gave a succinct summary. I've also now added other comments here, discussing my views. I don't believe it's necessary, and I would proscribe other ways to accompl…
-
comment
Comment #18945722
I feel very strongly that type safety is of paramount importance in development, and "oneof" (and other similar constructs) in protocol design breaks fundamental ideas of type safe…
-
comment
Comment #18945716
In proto3 all fields are optional. As such, I don't see the need for "oneof" since you should check in business logic whether or not the field is there. By using "oneof" you are de…
-
comment
Comment #18945707
I haven't specifically looked at the Kubernetes code base, but I will -- thanks for the pointer! We plan to expand / support / better standardize the annotations in the github.com/…
-
comment
Comment #18945706
Yes, this has the added benefit of standardizing protocol buffer based workflows across teams / repositories. I appreciate the criticism, but we (the Brankas developers) find this …
-
comment
Comment #18945699
There is an explanation in the README file, but I'll explain: It helps to standardize workflows across a number of different source repositories (all Go based), where a number of d…
-
comment
Comment #18937997
Thanks for the input -- this actually does support enums, using a variant of Go's const: type MyEnum int const ( MYENUMVAL MyEnum = iota ) It's a philosophical argument, but one sh…
-
comment
Comment #18937203
We just pushed the first initial, public release of Gunk, a modern frontend and syntax for Protocol Buffers. Check out releases here: https://github.com/gunk/gunk/releases/tag/v0.1…
- story
-
comment
Comment #18368196
You do not know what you are talking about. It is very clear (based on the above statements) that you have minimal, if zero real computer science education. Please stop commenting …