Viewing profile — kenpomeroy
kenpomeroy
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Apr 17, 2017, 2:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 9
- Public activity
- 31 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kenpomeroy
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #20520980
> free market You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
-
comment
Comment #20340098
Fossil fuel companies receive subsidies as well, what's your point?
-
comment
Comment #20340089
I said Tesla was perhaps "a" solution, not "the" solution. What alternative solutions do you propose?
-
comment
Comment #20334838
Even still, you're assuming the government has the ability to address climate change if given the chance. But, there would need to be global consensus and enforcement or government…
-
comment
Comment #20052017
If the government were mandating people behave a certain way, that would be an entirely different discussion. We're talking about a service that people can choose to use or not use…
-
comment
Comment #20051991
They quite literally are being judged by a jury of their peers... that is kind of my whole point.
-
comment
Comment #20041795
I struggle to see how anything you described could be categorized as "Orwellian"... Why are we concerned about "problem users" being left with no options? Just act like a normal hu…
-
comment
Comment #18790872
I did read the actual legislation.
-
comment
Comment #18778057
1. Sign lease for apartment in VT. 2. Lease deposit + new computer products = "qualified remote worker expenses". 3. Receive grant funds. 4. Resell computer products and never move…
-
comment
Comment #17205896
Some jobs generate less value for businesses than the arbitrary amount you deem to be a "livable wage." That's economics.
-
comment
Comment #17199046
Because economics
-
comment
Comment #17096562
> I can think of one.... not being used at all! You seem to be missing my entire point. There is nothing bad about consuming clean, renewable energy.
-
comment
Comment #17096517
You assume that a substantial portion of bitcoins are being mined in populated areas where the energy would otherwise be used for what you deem "better" purposes. How do you reach …
-
comment
Comment #17092000
If there's nothing inherently bad about energy consumption, why do you think it is an "issue" for 0.5% of the world's consumption to be used for mining bitcoin? What if 100% of bit…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17091703
Not sure why this is relevant unless you think 100% of bitcoin mining takes place in the US.
-
comment
Comment #17091369
There's nothing inherently bad about energy consumption. The raw amount of energy consumed is a useless metric without determining how much of this energy is derived from clean/ren…
-
comment
Comment #17078429
You can't wait for retail investors to be slaughtered?
-
comment
Comment #17043542
> It's well-known that deflationary currencies do not work. This is laughable. Your definition of "work" includes a presumption that we all want the government to control and manip…
-
comment
Comment #17043516
For cryptocurrency fans, it is quite obvious that such a system would not be desirable or beneficial at all. The entire purpose of cryptocurrency is to remove governmental control …
-
comment
Comment #17043446
Inflation hurts the poor far more than the rich. Rich people invest their money rather than simply holding cash and losing value through inflation. Poor people have no choice but t…
-
comment
Comment #16257961
Not saying I disagree, because I think the bar association is a cartel and everyone should be "allowed" to practice law. However, the reason the CA bar is "notoriously hard" is pre…
-
comment
Comment #15917595
If I had a bitcoin for every time I facepalmed while I read this...
-
comment
Comment #15909732
Of course Bitcoin's value is a function of its popularity - it is a network. Networks become more valuable (and more useful) the more popular they are.