Viewing profile — kennywinker
kennywinker
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Dec 27, 2010, 9:21 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 10,294
- Public activity
- 3,527 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kennywinker
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49224061
This is just one reason I prefer zigbee for smarthome devices. There is a protocol-level isolation between them and my home network. Really sad to see zigbee devices getting rarer
-
comment
Comment #49219320
Is deepseek actually turning enough of a profit off inference to fully pay for training the next model? And do those profits depend on releasing model weights somehow?
-
comment
Comment #49219310
> DS comes out (one of, or) the most successful quant fund in China > They don't strictly need any kind of subsidies. You understand how these two sentences directly contradict eac…
-
comment
Comment #49214537
The only flaw i see in your reasoning is trying to optimize a creative process. Piano rolls may be technically better, but since the majority of music is made with a piano roll you…
-
comment
Comment #49214428
Not counting the cost of making the model, which is subsidized by… someone? The chinese gov i think?
-
comment
Comment #49214383
Kinda is.
-
comment
Comment #49214351
If you’re gonna equate copyright law being tied to a majority sense of morality, with some kind of mob rule, ya lost me. Sure i don’t think the majority get to dictate things like …
-
comment
Comment #49210840
Wish i had your optimism.
-
comment
Comment #49205846
> but that's where the debate is at the moment. Because of the rulings of a couple of judges. Is that actually what the majority of people think? > Copyright law only considers ill…
-
comment
Comment #49205835
I mean... that's one interpretation of the law, sure. The law was written before the idea of an LLM existed, and some judges in some specific cases decided the previous law covered…
-
comment
Comment #49205792
Assuming moore's law like progress, which I'm 100% sure isn't going to happen - I think we're at the top of the S curve already. But assuming dramatically increased intelligence ev…
-
comment
Comment #49205754
That's because the super-enthusiast will upgrade in 4 months when a better model is released. The casual user would keep it for years. A year of claude at the lowest plan is almost…
-
comment
Comment #49203623
As i understand it, they accepted guilt for downloading stuff illegally. They didn’t accept guilt for incorporating all of human output into their model without consent.
-
comment
Comment #49192677
Not just when. Also if.
-
comment
Comment #49192031
If it’s not open weight, i don’t really care.
-
comment
Comment #49191962
Tearing something out only to re-build it a few months later is classic tech industry move fast and break things hubris. Most things exist for a reason, and if you don’t know the r…
-
comment
Comment #49179501
Do you mean hanlon’s razor?
-
comment
Comment #49165466
Sure. One could. But then one wouldn’t be in control of every step of the process.
-
comment
Comment #49164822
This feels like a trumpian tantrum from someone at openai. If they’re innocent, just win the lawsuit. Is this quibbling over details supposed to win the public over? Because afaik …
-
comment
Comment #49164279
Not great for coding, or realtime agent interactions. But for background processing tasks overnight? Seems like it’d work pretty well
-
comment
Comment #49164266
It says very prominently in the post: 4.5-5t/s for 80b on an M5
-
comment
Comment #49128070
Next time we will - provided you further lock yourself into our ecosystem.
-
comment
Comment #49098567
So you’re counting by dollar amount. Because find me a person who thinks 25% of their income is “next to nothing” Meanwhile, a tax avoiding billionaire will double their net worth …
-
comment
Comment #49088252
Can’t read it. Blocked by cloudflare.
-
comment
Comment #49086750
That landscape you wouldn’t want is in part a product of the small government you covet.