Viewing profile — keenerd
keenerd
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 02, 2009, 12:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,972
- Public activity
- 648 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About keenerd
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #17200259
I would love to merge that into Arch's wtf, but it is just a collection of scanned images. No text.
-
comment
Comment #17197191
I maintain my own set of modern internet acronyms for it. Speaking of which, I need to merge a pull request for that.
-
comment
Comment #17197021
For a modern *nix equivalent of DESQview take a look at Twin: https://github.com/cosmos72/twin/
-
comment
Comment #17058846
And how much horsepower do you need to shell into that cluster?
-
comment
Comment #17058845
I'm one of those people.
-
comment
Comment #17053830
I've been doing that for years: http://kmkeen.com/c100p-tweaks/ Development doesn't require any more CPU than word processing. You're type stuff up, and there is a pretty strict gr…
-
comment
Comment #17017069
> not possible to make today with with unlimited budgets The Lofstrom Loop is possible today for a few billion dollars. Though "catching" an incoming capsule with a Loop is going t…
-
comment
Comment #16894349
On the other hand... if you wanted to quickly identify incompetent individuals, give them rope and let them cause damage.
-
comment
Comment #16894169
Ignoring the BS about coriolis, I think there is something legit here. Of course there isn't any power to be gained from the vortex. What you would gain is a lot of RPMs from very …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #16717339
What is the net weight of a package? (And why isn't it on the packaging?)
-
comment
Comment #16568943
Areas of low contrast become whiter and areas of high contrast become more saturated. It is also more robust than k-means. The author's algo will only work on scanned images. Photo…
-
comment
Comment #16568383
A simpler way of achieving the same thing is to duplicate the layer, blur the top layer heavily, and then set it to "divide".
-
comment
Comment #16561227
It was faster to do this than reading the content the way it was intended. Because they were using random selection you'd have to click 370 times to have a 90% chance of seeing all…
-
comment
Comment #16560732
How did we both do this at exactly the same minute? You botched up something with the encoding though.
-
comment
Comment #16560720
This is absolutely infuriating to read because they've made it so that items are chosen randomly. Instead they should be using a shuffle. That way you don't have any repeats until …
-
comment
Comment #16509554
I'm willing to pay $5/month for one blog: my own. That is what a basic VPS with plenty of bandwidth costs. edit: Interesting, this is fast approaching my most downvoted comment eve…
-
comment
Comment #16462376
It can still be rational, but you need to look at shopping as an aggregate of probabilities. Let's make it more extreme. A $50 item for free or $50 off a $5000 purchase. Discounts …
-
comment
Comment #16454642
Here is how to solve them with SAT: http://kmkeen.com/battleship/
- story
-
comment
Comment #16442239
Eh, I'll stick with the PocketBeagle board. It is half the price, very easy to source, doesn't require any special connectors and has those extremely useful PRUs. Slightly larger, …
-
comment
Comment #16367374
Thanks. That makes sense. Most of my stuff has (at most) a few million clauses and usually takes between 1-600 seconds.
-
comment
Comment #16367267
I have not been too impressed with fancier SAT solvers. I'm currently drafting a blog post where I compare Minisat, Picosat, Cryptominisat, Lingeling and Glucose. (Those were all t…
-
comment
Comment #16348202
> The old word of "fake news" is propaganda. No, they are different by a matter of degree. Propaganda is all about spin, context, and stretching the truth. Stuff that actually happ…
-
comment
Comment #16314347
> their claim they owned all my work at all times How do they respond if you attempt to negotiate salary based on the expectation of putting in 8760 hours per year?