Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — kawhah

kawhah

HN member
Joined
Fri, Sep 08, 2023, 9:20 AM UTC
HN karma
306
Public activity
106 items

About kawhah

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #38654360

    Nothing is stopping them; this is exactly what people do.

  2. comment
    Comment #38403735

    The headline says that this year was the largest increase in population since 1962. That increase was 1% or ~600,000 people.

  3. comment
    Comment #38403188

    It is still small in relation to population change though.

  4. comment
    Comment #38403144

    > for every fairly executed person we can have up to one wrongly executed person, and that's totally fine? you are confusing two ratios. the number of fairly executed people and th…

  5. comment
    Comment #38402979

    Have you tried to get ChatGPT to answer questions about factual topics at a level of junior grad student/hobbyist independent researcher? It will generally tell you those things wh…

  6. comment
    Comment #38402946

    It seems odd to treat the suggestion that unnecessary emails cause excessive carbon emisions and the suggestion that unnecessary air travel causes excessive carbon emissions as the…

  7. comment
    Comment #38302729

    > so they get flooded by less tech-savy, more casual users that don't really see the value of open source other than they don't pay for it this was solved 30 years ago by an import…

  8. comment
    Comment #38302700

    In the UK, planning started on Hinkley Point in 2010. It was supposed to run at 3 TW by 2020, costing £24 per MWh. It's now 13 years into a process that is projected to complete in…

  9. comment
    Comment #38302574

    > Another is that these people are pretty good at starting shit storms trying to ruin your reputation if you don't comply with their unreasonable demands. If you go on social media…

  10. comment
    Comment #38302478

    So become a contractor, work for an inflated fee for two months. Then take a month off and work for yourself on whatever you want. Or just do nothing, if you prefer that to working…

  11. comment
    Comment #38302431

    > Most complex, unique, value producing things have a path to monetization for the builder of the thing. I don't think this is true. You need an extra condition 'that few people wa…

  12. comment
    Comment #38302209

    Yes, the main reason why people don't do this is because they aren't psychologically ready to find out that the thing which cost them a lot of effort has very little monetary value…

  13. comment
    Comment #38302191

    What is the evidence for this feeling of entitlement? I use tons of free software. I've never either demanded that anyone work on it for free, nor have I expressed any sense of ent…

  14. comment
    Comment #38302180

    > You could though, if the mindset of open source software consumers were to shift to 'pay for things you get value from' What if the mindset of producers were to shift? What if pe…

  15. comment
    Comment #38301723

    They were built in the past as part of nuclear-weapons-oriented industry of the Cold War. Like many things about nuclear, taking away the need to build weapons changes a lot of the…

  16. comment
    Comment #38301383

    My proposal would be to use combined cycle gas turbines to peak renewables until over-installation and storage make that no longer necessary. Gas is the cleanest fossil fuel. Moder…

  17. comment
    Comment #38263384

    No, I am saying that if a project is open sourced, and there is sufficient demand from people willing to pay for support, maintenance, etc, someone will come along to meet that dem…

  18. comment
    Comment #38262978

    If you're prepared to pay market rate for someone to maintain something you should always be able to find someone willing to accept market rate (by definition). This separates the …

  19. comment
    Comment #38205297

    the question is whether or not the same would happen with 'conventional' black paints.

  20. comment
    Comment #38205275

    No, the logarithmic effect bottoms out towards the low part of the scale. If you're somewhere very dark, your eye adjusts so that you get back to the middle of the range. But if yo…

  21. comment
    Comment #38203006

    Right but 40% of something very small is also very small. If you are experiencing the two blacks in a normal ambient environment around lighting and other non highly light absorben…

  22. comment
    Comment #38202989

    Did you reply to my comment without reading all the way to the end of the sentence?

  23. comment
    Comment #38202870

    Hmm, no. You rewrite it as key1 = foo/bar key2 = baz/bat a[key1] = b[key2] if (a[key1] == c) I'm sure a coder who understands the context can come up with better names than key1 an…

  24. comment
    Comment #38202844

    Thanks, I hate it.

  25. comment
    Comment #38202714

    So in other words, Black 4.0 'just a paint' is imperceptible from Vantablack using human vision, and the Anish Kapoor thing was just a publicity stunt?