Viewing profile — kawhah
kawhah
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 08, 2023, 9:20 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 306
- Public activity
- 106 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About kawhah
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #38654360
Nothing is stopping them; this is exactly what people do.
-
comment
Comment #38403735
The headline says that this year was the largest increase in population since 1962. That increase was 1% or ~600,000 people.
-
comment
Comment #38403188
It is still small in relation to population change though.
-
comment
Comment #38403144
> for every fairly executed person we can have up to one wrongly executed person, and that's totally fine? you are confusing two ratios. the number of fairly executed people and th…
-
comment
Comment #38402979
Have you tried to get ChatGPT to answer questions about factual topics at a level of junior grad student/hobbyist independent researcher? It will generally tell you those things wh…
-
comment
Comment #38402946
It seems odd to treat the suggestion that unnecessary emails cause excessive carbon emisions and the suggestion that unnecessary air travel causes excessive carbon emissions as the…
-
comment
Comment #38302729
> so they get flooded by less tech-savy, more casual users that don't really see the value of open source other than they don't pay for it this was solved 30 years ago by an import…
-
comment
Comment #38302700
In the UK, planning started on Hinkley Point in 2010. It was supposed to run at 3 TW by 2020, costing £24 per MWh. It's now 13 years into a process that is projected to complete in…
-
comment
Comment #38302574
> Another is that these people are pretty good at starting shit storms trying to ruin your reputation if you don't comply with their unreasonable demands. If you go on social media…
-
comment
Comment #38302478
So become a contractor, work for an inflated fee for two months. Then take a month off and work for yourself on whatever you want. Or just do nothing, if you prefer that to working…
-
comment
Comment #38302431
> Most complex, unique, value producing things have a path to monetization for the builder of the thing. I don't think this is true. You need an extra condition 'that few people wa…
-
comment
Comment #38302209
Yes, the main reason why people don't do this is because they aren't psychologically ready to find out that the thing which cost them a lot of effort has very little monetary value…
-
comment
Comment #38302191
What is the evidence for this feeling of entitlement? I use tons of free software. I've never either demanded that anyone work on it for free, nor have I expressed any sense of ent…
-
comment
Comment #38302180
> You could though, if the mindset of open source software consumers were to shift to 'pay for things you get value from' What if the mindset of producers were to shift? What if pe…
-
comment
Comment #38301723
They were built in the past as part of nuclear-weapons-oriented industry of the Cold War. Like many things about nuclear, taking away the need to build weapons changes a lot of the…
-
comment
Comment #38301383
My proposal would be to use combined cycle gas turbines to peak renewables until over-installation and storage make that no longer necessary. Gas is the cleanest fossil fuel. Moder…
-
comment
Comment #38263384
No, I am saying that if a project is open sourced, and there is sufficient demand from people willing to pay for support, maintenance, etc, someone will come along to meet that dem…
-
comment
Comment #38262978
If you're prepared to pay market rate for someone to maintain something you should always be able to find someone willing to accept market rate (by definition). This separates the …
-
comment
Comment #38205297
the question is whether or not the same would happen with 'conventional' black paints.
-
comment
Comment #38205275
No, the logarithmic effect bottoms out towards the low part of the scale. If you're somewhere very dark, your eye adjusts so that you get back to the middle of the range. But if yo…
-
comment
Comment #38203006
Right but 40% of something very small is also very small. If you are experiencing the two blacks in a normal ambient environment around lighting and other non highly light absorben…
-
comment
Comment #38202989
Did you reply to my comment without reading all the way to the end of the sentence?
-
comment
Comment #38202870
Hmm, no. You rewrite it as key1 = foo/bar key2 = baz/bat a[key1] = b[key2] if (a[key1] == c) I'm sure a coder who understands the context can come up with better names than key1 an…
-
comment
Comment #38202844
Thanks, I hate it.
-
comment
Comment #38202714
So in other words, Black 4.0 'just a paint' is imperceptible from Vantablack using human vision, and the Anish Kapoor thing was just a publicity stunt?