Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — katehikes88

katehikes88

HN member
Joined
Sun, Feb 25, 2024, 2:58 PM UTC
HN karma
7
Public activity
18 items

About katehikes88

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40056982

    sad thing is that you need to provide a phone number just to read those telegram and discord groups. 4chan is nothing like it used to be. it is run over by bot posts and shills fro…

  2. comment
    Comment #40056862

    You ought to adjust your expectations because they don't line up with reality. There is nothing particularly surprising or noteworthy about this vulnerability.

  3. comment
    Comment #40056820

    vaporware

  4. comment
    Comment #40055911

    But it's the exploit of the week! How can you not be excited about shaming the company for this amazing fuck up! Positive feedback for is completely missing from the field. Instead…

  5. comment
    Comment #40044002

    open the page in a browser save it to disk C-s run one of the above commands on the saved file

  6. comment
    Comment #40034151

    links -dump elinks -dump lynx -dump let me guess, you need more?

  7. story
    /g/ post counter reached 100M

    https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/99990420#p99999999 https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/99992178#p100000000

  8. comment
    Comment #39555130

    That's not a pipeline.

  9. comment
    Comment #39504790

    A proof of concept after five years and no serious plans going forward. There are plenty of vaporware with more to show.

  10. comment
    Comment #39503908

    Have you considered that parts of what you said might be true but you ridicule it only because you associate with the others might be untrue and maybe even ridiculous?

  11. comment
    Comment #39503863

    I suppose you didn't see the reply from a developer right under the post you linked.

  12. comment
    Comment #39503326

    The bottleneck for speed will be the human examining the documents so there really isn't any difference in the overall time spent. Even without the required human input it doesn't …

  13. comment
    Comment #39503324

    The detail you get is dependent on your prompt and the model you use. The LLM used might not be chatgpt. The level of detail isn't the only thing you should consider. The writing s…

  14. comment
    Comment #39501591

    It can with lesspipe but don't you think that's a bit of an overkill for a simple markdown document?

  15. comment
    Comment #39501455

    It is botspam and deserves to be flagged. Go ask chatgpt for explanation yourself instead of polluting forums with generated responses.

  16. comment
    Comment #39501433

    Probably because there is barely anything to explain. It's a babby's first oneliner. Everything after the first sentence in this comment seems to be LLM generated.

  17. comment
    Comment #39501394

    >multi-user support is planned The github issues are nothing more than a wishlist. There doesn't seem to be any serious plans for this feature and no one seems interested in workin…

  18. comment
    Comment #39501306

    Why not `find -name '*.fi.md' -exec less {} \;`