Viewing profile — katehikes88
katehikes88
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Feb 25, 2024, 2:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 7
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About katehikes88
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40056982
sad thing is that you need to provide a phone number just to read those telegram and discord groups. 4chan is nothing like it used to be. it is run over by bot posts and shills fro…
-
comment
Comment #40056862
You ought to adjust your expectations because they don't line up with reality. There is nothing particularly surprising or noteworthy about this vulnerability.
-
comment
Comment #40056820
vaporware
-
comment
Comment #40055911
But it's the exploit of the week! How can you not be excited about shaming the company for this amazing fuck up! Positive feedback for is completely missing from the field. Instead…
-
comment
Comment #40044002
open the page in a browser save it to disk C-s run one of the above commands on the saved file
-
comment
Comment #40034151
links -dump elinks -dump lynx -dump let me guess, you need more?
-
story
/g/ post counter reached 100M
https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/99990420#p99999999 https://boards.4chan.org/g/thread/99992178#p100000000
-
comment
Comment #39555130
That's not a pipeline.
-
comment
Comment #39504790
A proof of concept after five years and no serious plans going forward. There are plenty of vaporware with more to show.
-
comment
Comment #39503908
Have you considered that parts of what you said might be true but you ridicule it only because you associate with the others might be untrue and maybe even ridiculous?
-
comment
Comment #39503863
I suppose you didn't see the reply from a developer right under the post you linked.
-
comment
Comment #39503326
The bottleneck for speed will be the human examining the documents so there really isn't any difference in the overall time spent. Even without the required human input it doesn't …
-
comment
Comment #39503324
The detail you get is dependent on your prompt and the model you use. The LLM used might not be chatgpt. The level of detail isn't the only thing you should consider. The writing s…
-
comment
Comment #39501591
It can with lesspipe but don't you think that's a bit of an overkill for a simple markdown document?
-
comment
Comment #39501455
It is botspam and deserves to be flagged. Go ask chatgpt for explanation yourself instead of polluting forums with generated responses.
-
comment
Comment #39501433
Probably because there is barely anything to explain. It's a babby's first oneliner. Everything after the first sentence in this comment seems to be LLM generated.
-
comment
Comment #39501394
>multi-user support is planned The github issues are nothing more than a wishlist. There doesn't seem to be any serious plans for this feature and no one seems interested in workin…
-
comment
Comment #39501306
Why not `find -name '*.fi.md' -exec less {} \;`