Viewing profile — jyzzmoe

lame

Humans are able to recognize these as optical illusions. (otherwise we wouldn't be calling them "illusions") Further, none of the optical illusions shown are so wildly "off" and "c…

And yet ... http://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.1897v1.pdf%EF%BB%BF

A whiff of crankery about this site...

Something that married men have known since ... we've had marriage.

tard

Remember the gorilla arm. http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/G/gorilla-arm.html

Bullshit.

Insanity = {x + "can save billions" | x in {"functional programming" ,"object-oriented programming" ,"structured programming" ,"pair programming" ,"static typing" ,"scrum" ,"script…

How to make people stare at your blog: 1. Cartoon pictures of hot, well-endowed chicks. [end]

Worst. Ads. Ever.

http://i.imgur.com/6FUlWJR.png Fixed. Thank you for bringing this important matter to my attention.

Only a gullible pinhead would think that this is true.

blogspam

Enabled by the MagicalHypeFactory (aka Google), Bing, Yahoo! etc. as explained in the article.

This will amount to exactly nothing.

http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1557/PreviewComp/Su...

Don't worry, Schmidt is also confused.

"suck it half of MIT" It is not clear if 50% means: (1) "50% of the total" (2) "in each school, 50% of those asked could not answer the question".

And 0.10 popped into my head as well. However, the fact that this was even asked as a question would cause someone to stop and think a bit more analytically I would think.

A = bat price B = ball price (1) A + B = 1.1 (2) A - B = 1 (1) + (2) : 2A = 2.1 => A = 1.05 => B = 0.05. I don't understand the fuss.

Don't waste your time.

And an ad company is designing the home of the future because!?!?!