Viewing profile — jwise0
jwise0
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 05, 2012, 7:16 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,969
- Public activity
- 220 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jwise0
http://www.joshuawise.com/
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #46545907
Hi, original presenter here :) The beginning is FTs 101. The end gets more application-centric around OFDM and is why it feels 'unreasonably effective' to me. If it feels obvious, …
-
comment
Comment #45972995
As someone else posted a link to the Reddit thread, I posted there to say, roughly, 'no, I'm pretty unhappy about it'.
-
comment
Comment #45972805
Lance -- I really like this comment because it is a compelling argument for something other than the viewpoint I hold. Obviously I am not fully convinced by it (yet?). But this is …
-
comment
Comment #30805869
I was Chris's housemate at the time, the victim of the hours of 'sssshhhh sssshhhh shhhhh'. Interestingly, he rendered this mostly by drawing boxes in pov-ray -- I'm not sure what …
-
comment
Comment #17697909
Oh, and a quick update on this -- I just got mail back from Chip at Wahoo. (Looks like my previous mail got caught in a spam filter.) They're looking to get a bunch of the attribut…
-
comment
Comment #17694761
I was kind of surprised too. I have some conjectures about the internal politics from the output that I observed (super friendly, super helpful support team; development team knew …
-
comment
Comment #17694751
Hi, HN! Author, here. Yeah, I was a little disappointed by the GPL and attribution issues, too. But also, I feel a little bad not having given them too much time to respond, or too…
-
comment
Comment #13068054
This appears to have been flagbombed.
-
comment
Comment #12865559
Well, what you want and the physical realities of synthesis are different :-) In the early days of compilers, of course, you were mostly writing C as a macro language for your syst…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #12511389
This is content stolen from Wired, from 2007: http://archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/12/sl...
-
comment
Comment #12489983
I think I agree with at least some of what you say. I feel bad viewing content from small blogs without "paying" for it. My current best compromise is that I run uBlock Origin with…
-
comment
Comment #12487845
Well, the royal "we", perhaps :-) I started blocking ads because they dramatically slowed down my browsing experience. But I keep blocking ads because, fundamentally, I believe tha…
-
comment
Comment #12422161
How much time do you spend these days being chased by ISO 26262 requirements, and the like?
-
comment
Comment #12422157
I've served a whole bunch of roles in my five years at my current employer, and I'd probably classify myself as being an "electrical engineer" for all of them. (No single experienc…
-
comment
Comment #12386570
I applaud the idea of helping people with depression, anxiety, mood disorders, and that cluster of symptoms and illnesses. We talk a lot about how it's prevalent, but we don't talk…
-
comment
Comment #12369105
It seems that this is getting downvoted, and I want to explain why I agree with the downvotes: The policy on that web page has two egregious issues. 1) It does not have any provisi…
- story
-
comment
Comment #12263889
Interesting. I've seen some other work done on gradient-aware demosaic using directional masks, and the devil appears to be in the details: it can reconstruct a lot of sharpness wh…
-
comment
Comment #12212154
Also, is it just me, or does the logo look like it says "fu"? I bounced it off a few other people and they also all seem to think it says "fu". (I was looking at https://www.amium.…
-
comment
Comment #12050446
I think there is a fair bit of "how to lie with graphs" here going on. For instance, the 'housing construction boom' very carefully does not show any context before 2014, and altho…
-
comment
Comment #11757175
I think I'd take the opposite tack, by the way. I get about a zillion job recruiter e-mails, and the vast majority are mail merge. It's irritating, but not disqualifying, for the r…
-
comment
Comment #11714941
These people are humans.