Viewing profile — jwakely
jwakely
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 08, 2017, 1:49 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 9
- Public activity
- 8 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jwakely
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47086976
It's a valid concern, and one that was raised on reddit a few times too. But if you're building an open and fair model, I hope you're not just sucking up the entire web and trainin…
-
comment
Comment #14294768
> Look at GCC's attitude to plugins or good error messages. Which is? A patch isn't necessary for it to be fixed, but a bug report generally is. A blog post linking to unofficial c…
-
comment
Comment #14294753
It's not a known issue, but GLIBCPP_FORCE_NEW has had no effect on libstdc++ code for more than a decade, so I wonder which prehistoric version you're using. Even the modern GLIBCX…
-
comment
Comment #14291722
Facts and up-to-date documentation, how novel.
-
comment
Comment #14291592
By default libstdc++ stopped using the pooling allocator in 2005: https://gcc.gnu.org/r106665 That's one year after the ancient, bitrotted, unofficial copy of the libstdc++ documen…
-
comment
Comment #14291506
That's a different library.
-
comment
Comment #14291505
The pooling behaviour of the libstdc++ std::allocator was only the default from 2004 until late 2005, so it went away more than a decade ago.
-
comment
Comment #14291433
GCC's std::allocator also doesn't do that (not for at least a decade, IIRC). It's a non-default allocator, which nobody is forced to use. It's entirely optional. The default std::a…