Viewing profile — jvink
jvink
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Mar 25, 2015, 2:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 65
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jvink
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49233951
Working on the ability to create mixnets with sanctum [0] and its cathedrals. Sanctum already has very capable traffic analysis protections in place in the form of shroud, but bein…
-
comment
Comment #47313456
Picked up hacking on sanctum again after a break - https://sanctorum.se/
-
comment
Comment #46579603
I've just released sanctum 1.0.0 and am taking 2-3 weeks off from hacking on it while I work on a little dumb game to be creative in a different way.
- story
-
comment
Comment #46271678
Mostly been working on tier6 [0], which is "like" zerotier but over the sanctum protocol and fully open source (ISC licensed). Getting ready to release a 1.0.0 of sanctum [1], afte…
- story
-
comment
Comment #45884683
Working on cross-flock discovery in sanctum [1] so I can cut a 1.0 release hopefully before Christmas. I am always looking for more people to test and play with it or even review t…
-
comment
Comment #44704326
Working on sanctum [0] and reliquary [1]. Soon approaching a 1.0 release for sanctum once I get my brain out of vacation mode and into hacking mode again. A lot has happened this y…
-
comment
Comment #44416114
Look into sanctum [1] it's cathedral mode. You can self-host those entirely and they're only discovery nodes. Once the tunnel is up the cathedral isn't involved unless for black ke…
- story
-
comment
Comment #43532094
I am continuing work on https://reliquary.se - a VPN for the hackers - based on my fully privilege separated and sandboxed VPN sanctum ( https://sanctum.se ). It is shaping up nice…
-
story
Show HN: End-to-end encrypted, peer-to-peer VPN tunnels for hackers
Hello HN, I would like to announce the soft availability of The Reliquary [0]: A "VPN" service for hackers. Note that VPN is in air quotes here because it is not a traditional cons…
- story
-
comment
Comment #19520970
> (also working on OpenCVS) Not actively. It has been in hybernation for a long time. Not counting the recently-ish fixes I committed not much is happening with it.
-
comment
Comment #11753163
I understand. You're not forced to use the CLI create/build/run commands for anything. They just make it easier, but you are in no way tied to this. Building the module itself can …
-
comment
Comment #11752692
Author of Kore here. What fears? Care to elaborate? I'd love to hear!
-
comment
Comment #9600213
For sanity sake, this build option is now NOTLS.
-
comment
Comment #9563759
That's fair. Parenthesising return is a matter of readability and flavour to me. It tickles my spidey sense if it is missing. I strongly dislike declaring variables anywhere else b…
-
comment
Comment #9563576
Author here. I see you picked out the few things that I consistently hear on the coding style I adopted which is based on my time hacking on openbsd. I have no real points to argue…
-
comment
Comment #9561222
Thanks. I agree the BENCHMARK build option is a bit confusing. I might end up renaming it altogether.
-
comment
Comment #9560620
That is great, thanks for sharing.
-
comment
Comment #9560221
Correct. The accepting socket is shared between multiple workers which each have its own fd for epoll or kqueue. Because of this a form of serialising the accepts between said work…
-
comment
Comment #9559772
Except you are basing yourself on the fact it creates a single worker process per connection. It does not. Workers are spawned when the server is started. Each of them deals with t…
-
comment
Comment #9559450
Kore does not fork per connection. It uses per cpu worker processes which multiplex I/O over either epoll or kqueue.
-
comment
Comment #9559235
It is not a forking web server. It is evented I/O with multiple worker processes. It is literally in the documentation and easily spottable in the code.