Viewing profile — juxtaposicion
juxtaposicion
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 12, 2013, 6:21 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 297
- Public activity
- 67 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About juxtaposicion
chrisemoody@gmail.com
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46631799
Chrisemoody.com
-
comment
Comment #46327373
Nice work. I’ve also tinkered on unit pricing! I worked on Popgot.com, which is similar but for the US and tracks non-perishable staples
-
comment
Comment #45128505
Got it, thanks! Yeah, so it makes sense that any age-bucketing like this would have a similar effect
-
comment
Comment #45123544
I'm not sure I understand. Your model shows that different group buckets (eg 20-24yo vs 25-29yo) peak at different years (in your figure, 2022 vs 2024) despite being driven by the …
-
comment
Comment #45013736
Yeah, agree most daily purchases are humdrum and shouldn’t command all of my attention. Incidentally, my last project is about buying by unit price. Shameless plug, but for vitmain…
-
comment
Comment #44713703
The LLMs are in fact quite expensive! We run dozen of LLM calls across thousands of products. That's thousands to tens of thousands of calls per search query . The idea is we've go…
-
comment
Comment #44713656
thanks! let me know if y'all have any feedback :)
-
comment
Comment #44713651
I had to look at that carefully, but I think that "save you $57.65 on 33 fl oz" is both technically and meaningfully correct. It compares our best choice to the most popular choice…
-
comment
Comment #44706277
That’s pretty interesting. I’ve using Airtable’s “field agents” for a similar use case, but would love to use this instead. Does it automatically cache values? (Don’t want to pay f…
-
comment
Comment #44706116
I’m building Popgot ( https://popgot.com ): compare unit prices (per oz/sheet/lb) across Costco, Walmart, Target, and Amazon. We normalize fuzzy sizes (“family,” “mega,” multipacks…
-
comment
Comment #43828581
My pleasure! Happy you could use it as much as I do. Anyway we can chat in person? I'd love to make more stuff for you. chris@ .com
-
comment
Comment #43827723
Yeah, I agree. It is a pain to search product by product instead of sticking to one store. Also popgot.com can only do what's online & shipped to you -- so really just the non-peri…
-
comment
Comment #43826969
Ah, hell yeah! My buddy on this project has been itching to add sweetmarias.com ... he just needed this as an excuse. So yeah, we'll add it. If you shoot me an email (or post it he…
-
comment
Comment #43825852
I'm so glad you like it! We have historical price tracking in the database, but haven't exposed it as a product yet. What do you have in mind / what would you use it for?
-
comment
Comment #43825835
Glad you guys mentioned Costco -- I happen to have written a blog post on exactly that: https://popgot.com/blog/retailer-comparison Surprisingly, Costco does not win most of the ti…
-
comment
Comment #43821480
I’m working on Popgot ( https://popgot.com ), a tool that tracks unit prices (cost per ounce, sheet, pound) across Costco, Walmart, Target, and Amazon. It normalizes confusing list…
-
comment
Comment #43292104
It’s interesting to see how differentiable logic/binary circuits can be made cheap at inference time. But what about the theoretical expressiveness of logic circuits vs baselines l…
-
comment
Comment #42704175
Right the hope was to go further. E.g. if the input is: ``` class Classification(BaseModel): color: Literal['red', 'blue', 'green'] ``` then the output type would be: ``` class Cla…
-
comment
Comment #42702910
This looks great; very useful for (example) ranking outputs by confidence so you can do human reviews of the not-confident ones. Any chance we can get Pydantic support?
-
comment
Comment #41460377
Like other comments, I was also initially surprised. But I think the gains are both real and easy to understand where the improvements are coming from. Under the hood Reflection 70…
-
comment
Comment #41062921
Oh, thanks! I added my email to my profile. Look forward to replying to your note!
-
comment
Comment #41062770
We're building that spreadsheet as a product. I'd love to show you. I'd message you a private link to a prototype but you have no contact info on your profile. If you are intereste…
-
comment
Comment #37834089
For a "small" dataset of 50M and 0.5TB in size with 20 results get around 50-100ms.
-
comment
Comment #37826963
I'd love to know the answer here too! I've ran a few tests on pg and retrieving 100 random indices from a billion-scale table -- without vectors, just a vanilla table with an int64…
-
comment
Comment #37826925
Disk retrieval is definitely slower. In-memory retrieval typically can be ~1ms or less, whereas disk retrieval on a fast network drive is 50-100ms. But frankly, for any use case I …