Viewing profile — justsubmit

Well, dang, would you please enforce the guidelines fairly, then? You didn't chastise the poster of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21215968 for his disingenuous cherry-pickin…

Because RDF looks like this: Eric Miller Dr.

I don't know what to tell you, either. The IPCC is not a scientific body, it's a political body. It's a source of misinformation. Your posts are also full of cherry-picking. Some t…

A prediction that fails to materialize is not a scientific one.

Thou foul hypocrite and deceiver. I won't throw Wikipedia links at you for those terms, because you obviously know how to (ab)use it.

> you don't expect your collection to retain long-gone files unless it's an ever-growing pile of tapes/discs. Rule number whatever of backups: Don't discard old backups. Bitrot occ…

> What's your criteria for backup? Something like Attic, Borg, CrashPlan, Restic, etc, that allow snapshot retention periods, like "1 per year for the last X years, 1 per month for…

Wait, you think Clinton was going to start a war with Russia? Did you miss how she sold American uranium interests to Russia? Did you miss how Russia worked with her campaign to pr…

Ah, gatekeeping, how convenient. 1. Invent a pseudoscientific field. 2. Make normative, political claims from said field. 3. When people outside the field express dissent, invent a…

> HOWEVER, with this new 7.0 release you can pay a little more and increase that retention time to one year, or forever. This was a highly requested feature for the situation you r…

> There's definitely issues in science with things like repeatability in individual studies, but that doesn't apply to something like AGW. That's nonsense. Not only have you not su…

That sounds really interesting. How do you manage the library, especially in regard to storage limits, expiring old content, etc?

One may or may not like it, but that is language how literally works. You may not like my swapping the definitions of those words, but that is language how literally works. Therefo…

Did you read about the 500 scientists who wrote a letter to the U.N. a few days ago indicating just that? Well, you probably didn't, because the mainstream media didn't cover it. Y…

> I want peer-reviewed science, like the vastly significant body of research that has been produced showing AGW. Are you also unaware of the peer-review crisis? > No. You're the on…

> What blocks you from even considering the option? Human biology, perhaps? After all, haven't we evolved over thousands of years to be omnivores? > It's a little strange to see a …

> Sure, they could try fighting a guerilla warfare, they'd even inflict some casualties against the enemy but it's unlikely that in the end they'd succeed against an army that is p…

Wow, who could argue with such a great package. BTW, since you care about reducing wealth inequality, can you send a dono to my paypal?

That's right: when you can't answer, just downvote. If you didn't have 66,000 karma, maybe you'd be held accountable by the mods for religious and political flamewars. But since yo…

Your reaction shows that we have reached the crux of the matter. Don't take my word for it. You're on the Internet. Look up the evidence about Cook's paper. Their fraud was exposed…

You cited skepticalscience.com, which is John Cook's web site. He's a known scientific fraud, behind the paper Cook, et al, which is cited as the source of the "consensus" claim. I…

It's downvoted because some random user with >=500 karma didn't like it and clicked the down arrow. That's all downvoting means here. There are no ethics for voting here. In effect…

Your use of weasel words like "plenty of" and "tend to" shows that this is just your biased impression, not necessarily representative of actual populations. As well, your characte…

> At the time, I quipped to myself and my friends that they better take the "C" out of their name since AFAIK helping those in need is part of the proverbial "loving thy neighbor" …