Viewing profile — justinschuh
justinschuh
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jun 26, 2011, 6:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,416
- Public activity
- 397 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About justinschuh
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #14612119
This argument is false on its face. There's overwhelming evidence in the Crowdstrike releases prior to the election[1]. And there's far more from them and at least half a dozen res…
-
comment
Comment #14493212
> The network stack has been out of the content process for a super long time, it is not a new thing. FWIW, Chrome's network stack doesn't live in the content process either. It's …
-
comment
Comment #14492928
I don't keep up too much on Safari these days, so congrats on moving the network stack out of the content process. But looking at the current WebProcess seat-belt policy and what g…
-
comment
Comment #14492024
Indeed. Fixed now, and thanks for letting me know.
-
comment
Comment #14491841
Just to add some context, on macOS you can look at the seat-belt policy as a rough analog of for basic sandboxing guarantees, where the fewer exceptions you have the stronger your …
-
comment
Comment #13960910
So, the thing we call "win32k lockdown" on Chrome is just a term for the various things we had to do to enable ProcessSystemCallDisablePolicy on our sandboxed renderer processes (t…
-
comment
Comment #13957787
Yup. Our only closed source bits at this point are Flash and the Widevine CDM (DRM), both of which can be disabled from: Settings -> Content Settings.
-
comment
Comment #13470997
There's no reason for FUD. We've always listed all potential data transmission or collection in this regularly updated whitepaper: https://www.google.com/chrome/browser/privacy/whi…
-
comment
Comment #13470941
Please don't spread misinformation. Here are the facts: 1. While the Hotword module was downloaded at startup, the feature was not activated without the user explicitly enabling it…
-
comment
Comment #13355436
Really? Repeatedly? So, I'm sure you can produce a citation to this effect?
-
comment
Comment #13343531
> when riseup.net got an NSL to give access to the email accounts This is simply not true. An NSL cannot be used to compel access to any communication content—and certainly not con…
-
comment
Comment #13295854
No worries. :)
-
comment
Comment #13294899
I think you may be confused about who you're replying to and what subject you're replying on.
-
comment
Comment #13284561
I think we've seen it once so far, for a Flash exploit that didn't have a sandbox escape in Chrome.
-
comment
Comment #12943447
Obama's first term was a firehose of this kind of hate from Beck: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/beck-compares-obama-to-the-nazis... I actually watch Fox with some regularity and foll…
-
comment
Comment #12943435
No, all we have right now are projections, which put Clinton at ~2% lead in the popular vote. We won't have final vote counts until probably December, because many millions of outs…
-
comment
Comment #12943321
I wonder whether you actually read the article you linked, because here's how he tries to shift the blame and deny his own accountability: >Now, I’ve got people on the left accusin…
-
comment
Comment #12935826
A non-free pass would mean Beck actually took responsibility for his actions and apologized rather than than attempt to excuse himself with false equivalence. Let's be clear, he ba…
-
comment
Comment #12931034
That video was posted back in March, during the Republican primaries. I have no idea why you think it's related to the protests this week.
-
comment
Comment #11471586
Mentioning BadUSB very much implies confusion about the threat models at play. That is, the threat model for BadUSB is a malicious device that attacks the host OS, drivers, or appl…
-
comment
Comment #11471487
This response just doesn't make sense given that modern OSes expose USB through much higher-level device management and communication APIs. Those are the APIs browsers use, and I'v…
-
comment
Comment #11466692
Sorry, you seem to have misread my statement. Everything you just listed are devices that the OS already natively binds. I'm not aware of anyone considering WebUSB implementations …
-
comment
Comment #11466602
Sorry, but I'm at a loss for what you believe you're responding to here. I made a clear, factual statement regarding the handling of bound USB devices for known devices and classes…
-
comment
Comment #11466349
That's not at all an accurate framing. I'm not aware of any implementation that plans to allow access to HID devices (keyboard, mouse, etc.) or other device classes that are alread…
-
comment
Comment #11466143
This particular restriction is intended to address things like authentication devices (e.g. gnubby) where you basically destroy the entire security model if a user accidentally all…