Viewing profile — junrushao1994
junrushao1994
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 12, 2018, 4:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 336
- Public activity
- 63 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About junrushao1994
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #38196838
This is great! Have you guys considered integrating with one of the existing systems?
-
comment
Comment #37951057
Yeah thanks for sharing! This is definitely super valuable data and insights :) Regarding exllama-V2, MLC/TVM does benchmark against it: - Single GPU: https://github.com/mlc-ai/llm…
-
comment
Comment #37950742
Machine Learning Compilation (MLC) now supports compiling LLMs to multiple GPUs. For Llama2-70B, it runs 4-bit quantized Llama2-70B at: - 34.5 tok/sec on two NVIDIA RTX 4090 at $3k…
- story
-
comment
Comment #37135404
Ah please help us by submitting a PR! I noticed the rust build failed last night but didn’t get a chance to look into it
-
comment
Comment #37101904
This is a particular unique course offering introduction on ML compilation and deployment :)
-
comment
Comment #37072743
As of today performance in WebGPU isn't as competitive yet, but there are really quite a lot of low-hanging fruits for WebGPU to pick up.
-
comment
Comment #37072720
That's a great idea! We should dig around and see if there's any plugin to use
-
comment
Comment #37072208
This is amazing to hear Steven! (Sorry I locked myself out of discord a couple of days ago...) I'm sure there's bunch of features missing like biased sampling you mentioned, and mo…
-
comment
Comment #37072174
True and there are some other issues to be addressed. Those two particular issue is on our roadmap. Regarding quantization, we wanted to develop a code path that absorbs any quanti…
-
comment
Comment #37071835
LLM decoding is dominated by memory bandwidth, and 3090Ti and 4090 happen to have the identical theoretical memory bandwidth
-
comment
Comment #37071816
We haven't done any comparison them yet, but generally we believe Vulkan as a more generic cross-vendor API should be slower than ROCm. Same for CUDA vs Vulkan.
-
comment
Comment #37071811
Well, I'm very much into true open source, and my belief is that any contributor is automatically part of the team :)
-
comment
Comment #37071806
Generally speaking I expect Vulkan to be slower than ROCm given it's designed for generic gaming across GPU vendors, so the takeaway is, whenever ROCm is available and usable, we s…
-
comment
Comment #37071799
> Can you comment on how difficult it was to achieve this, and what the relative advantages b/w cards? Thanks for asking! I personally believe TVM Unity is a proper software stack …
-
comment
Comment #37069825
Really depends on how good ROCm support for WSL2 is. Our team don't have a windows machine so could not verify ourselves, but if you got ROCm set up properly on WSL2, MLC LLM shoul…
-
comment
Comment #37069446
ROCm has improved a lot over the past few months, and now ROCm 5.6 seems to work out of box by just following this tutorial: https://rocm.docs.amd.com/en/latest/deploy/linux/instal…
-
comment
Comment #37069409
yeah we tried out popular solutions like exllama and llama.cpp among others that support inference of 4bit quantized models
-
comment
Comment #37069014
tbh im not sure what amds plan is on ROCm support on consumer devices, but i dont really think amd is being fraudulent or something. Both rocm and vulkan are supported in MLC LLM a…
-
comment
Comment #37068983
One of the authors here. Glad it’s on HackerNews! There are two points I personally wanted to make through this project: 1) With a sufficiently optimized software stack, AMD GPUs c…
-
comment
Comment #36852111
I don't think TVM advertised a lot on its full capabilities, for example, high-perf codegen for dynamic shapes without auto-tuning, or auto-tuning-based codegen, at least in the pa…
-
comment
Comment #36804462
Yeah I believe countless new research and product ideas will be built on top of the open-source Llama-2
- story
- story
- story