Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jufter

jufter

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jul 11, 2025, 2:28 AM UTC
HN karma
5
Public activity
10 items

About jufter

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44920418

    > but suggesting that highly skilled tech jobs are a solution is just not realistic. I went from homeless to six figures thanks to tech. I think you are missing that tech is one of…

  2. comment
    Comment #44876015

    > ..kind of breaks the typical stack-trace patterns. The expectation that iterative recursion ought to have a call stack is the problem here and wouldn't be up for debate if people…

  3. comment
    Comment #44768414

    There is truth to this but it's important to acknowledge that exposure therapy alone may not be sufficient for everyone and will require alternative modalities.

  4. comment
    Comment #44650024

    Yep. Even io_uring sends all block device commands to a backend thread pool. I think only benefit is reduced syscall overhead.

  5. comment
    Comment #44645310

    Instead of adding another dependency you can just call `loop.run_in_executor` yourself: https://github.com/Tinche/aiofiles/blob/main/src/aiofiles/ba...

  6. comment
    Comment #44645135

    I'm glad it was reposted so I saw it. I may actually use python for scripting now because uv makes it so easy.

  7. comment
    Comment #44595323

    > My thesis is that I disagree that "Self-Taught Engineers Often Outperform" They do in FAANG.

  8. comment
    Comment #44551466

    Was going to ask how this integrates into Envoy but dug into the code it looks like proxywasm which must mean `envoy.bootstrap.wasm` ?

  9. comment
    Comment #44550698

    > how do i know that the CPU thing does not block inside my async io thing? I think it's common sense to not interweave IO with long-running CPU, hence sans IO. If you want to go t…

  10. comment
    Comment #44527919

    Aren't threads overkill for an IO workload? You can do a lot with 1 thread and epoll(7).