Viewing profile — jufter
jufter
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jul 11, 2025, 2:28 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 5
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jufter
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44920418
> but suggesting that highly skilled tech jobs are a solution is just not realistic. I went from homeless to six figures thanks to tech. I think you are missing that tech is one of…
-
comment
Comment #44876015
> ..kind of breaks the typical stack-trace patterns. The expectation that iterative recursion ought to have a call stack is the problem here and wouldn't be up for debate if people…
-
comment
Comment #44768414
There is truth to this but it's important to acknowledge that exposure therapy alone may not be sufficient for everyone and will require alternative modalities.
-
comment
Comment #44650024
Yep. Even io_uring sends all block device commands to a backend thread pool. I think only benefit is reduced syscall overhead.
-
comment
Comment #44645310
Instead of adding another dependency you can just call `loop.run_in_executor` yourself: https://github.com/Tinche/aiofiles/blob/main/src/aiofiles/ba...
-
comment
Comment #44645135
I'm glad it was reposted so I saw it. I may actually use python for scripting now because uv makes it so easy.
-
comment
Comment #44595323
> My thesis is that I disagree that "Self-Taught Engineers Often Outperform" They do in FAANG.
-
comment
Comment #44551466
Was going to ask how this integrates into Envoy but dug into the code it looks like proxywasm which must mean `envoy.bootstrap.wasm` ?
-
comment
Comment #44550698
> how do i know that the CPU thing does not block inside my async io thing? I think it's common sense to not interweave IO with long-running CPU, hence sans IO. If you want to go t…
-
comment
Comment #44527919
Aren't threads overkill for an IO workload? You can do a lot with 1 thread and epoll(7).