Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jterenzio

jterenzio

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jul 25, 2011, 4:34 PM UTC
HN karma
897
Public activity
54 items

About jterenzio

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #17861426

    Is there a good link to learn more about that?

  4. comment
    Comment #17861108

    Thanks for the comment. I was trying to make clear this is a short-term strategy in a rising rate environment where you eventually want the principal back and don't want to take mu…

  5. comment
    Comment #17860930

    I added a note in my article to clarify this. My strategy here is short-term. You want to withdraw your capital eventually, not hold forever. Maybe you are saving for a house in a …

  6. comment
    Comment #17860802

    Cool. I will read that. I'm trying to address the practical case of buying something, earning interest, then selling it and/or having it mature, not holding into perpetuity. Maybe …

  7. comment
    Comment #17860769

    Automated CD ladders are great too. The only issues are if you need to liquidate in an emergency you take a bigger hit, and you owe state tax but in general they can be good enough…

  8. comment
    Comment #17860744

    > The mindset for rational and sane upward mobility seems to remain stubbornly out of reach, causing many honest, decent people to save up nest eggs which are then extremely vulner…

  9. comment
    Comment #17860371

    > Some firms offer target maturity bond funds which will is the best of both worlds. These are great for corporate bonds. Check out iShares iBonds if you want to include corporate …

  10. comment
    Comment #17860331

    In theory that's true if you hold the fund forever but take the example of VGSH from another comment thread. If you bought that fund exactly 1 year ago and sold today you would hav…

  11. comment
    Comment #17860234

    I am not sure if that's true for non-fixed-maturity funds because the fund manager will keep the ladder rolling after 5-7 years, ie. the fund won't just pay out at maturity - they …

  12. comment
    Comment #17860141

    Definitely a good alternative if your broker charges fees. As mentioned Fidelity does not but I suspect that's not the norm...

  13. comment
    Comment #17860122

    Yes, but the yield on the payouts is only around 2.5% with this fund so the price change has a massive effect on your overall return.

  14. comment
    Comment #17860102

    I mentioned it my post that and it's something to consider. With treasuries the spread is fairly tight.

  15. comment
    Comment #17860081

    I'm not sure that works universally. If you buy a bond with a 2% yield today that matures in 3 years and you decide to sell in 1 year instead and at that point the current rate is …

  16. comment
    Comment #17860048

    It depends. In my article I pointed out that with Fidelity there are no commissions or markups on treasuries on the secondary market. If there were, it would definitely change the …

  17. comment
    Comment #17859992

    You are correct in rising interest rate environments where you believe the rates will continue to rise. With bond funds you can get the same yield as the ladder (interest payments)…

  18. comment
    Comment #17859958

    What holding does is lock your returns and sets a floor. When you buy a bond and hold it you will be guaranteed to receive the return. Sure if rates rise afterwards you have opport…

  19. comment
    Comment #17859878

    I agree for long-term investments a fund might be better (ex. in a retirement account mixed with equity funds) but if you bought those bond funds in the past few years and sold the…

  20. story
  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #8625025

    Thanks for the comment. I chose that picture more to capture the spirit of collaboration than to highlight specific code. We still have a lot of legacy code that we're constantly t…

  23. story
  24. story
  25. story