Viewing profile — jspahrsummers
jspahrsummers
HN member- Joined
- Fri, May 31, 2013, 9:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 38
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jspahrsummers
https://github.com/jspahrsummers
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42250859
You can find more information on some design questions like these in https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io/specification , which is a much more "implementors" focused guide than the…
-
comment
Comment #42242174
We're still in the process of thinking through and fleshing out full details for remote MCP connections. This is definitely a good idea to include in the mix!
-
comment
Comment #42242102
Definitely not geolocked! Please try the debugging guide here: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/tools/debugging
-
comment
Comment #42242099
There's a debugging guide here that may be helpful: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/tools/debugging
-
comment
Comment #42242080
Your concerns are very valid. This is partly why right now, in Claude Desktop, it's not possible to grant permission permanently. The most you can do is "Allow for this chat," whic…
-
comment
Comment #42242062
We definitely hope this will solve the NxM problem. On tools specifically, we went back and forth about whether the other primitives of MCP ultimately just reduce to tool use, but …
-
comment
Comment #42240552
Our thinking is that prompts will generally be a user initiated feature of some kind. These docs go into a bit more detail: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/concepts/prompts ht…
-
comment
Comment #42239686
This is a great idea! There's also the matter of requests' result types not being automatically inferred in the SDK right now, which would be great to fix. Could I convince you to …
-
comment
Comment #42239470
We do want to improve this over time, just trying to find the right balance between usability and security. Although MCP is powerful and we hope it'll really unlock a lot of potent…
-
comment
Comment #42238943
We're definitely interested in extending MCP to cover remote connections as well. Both SDKs already support an SSE transport with that in mind: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs…
-
comment
Comment #42238482
You can read how we're implementing versioning here: https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/basic/ver... It's not exactly immutable, but any backwards incompatible chan…
-
comment
Comment #42238476
Sorry, I think that's just the nav on those docs being confusing (particularly on mobile). You can see the spec here: https://spec.modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/
-
comment
Comment #42238012
Already available in the latest at https://claude.ai/download !
-
comment
Comment #42237860
Probably, yes! You could imagine building an MCP server (integration) for a particular piece of legacy software, and inside that server, you could employ Computer Use to actually u…
-
comment
Comment #5801901
We do need some examples, but the headers are documented quite extensively, FWIW.