Viewing profile — jsjohnst
jsjohnst
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 29, 2010, 6:52 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,730
- Public activity
- 3,751 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jsjohnst
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jsjohnst; my proof: https://keybase.io/jsjohnst/sigs/uQQ39-qxaI5jsWhRqn7lnwcUuTOmcCFh8m1eVSC8nso ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49167386
> This is why even their single core mobile chips in the budget line Neo That’s a six core processor. It’s an A18 Pro in the Neo, same chip as on the Iphone 16 Pro
-
comment
Comment #47740437
Since the majority shareholder(s) can decide to replace the board of directors, it’s not the board of directors who holds the (ultimate) power, it’s the majority shareholder(s).
-
comment
Comment #47180071
> There are competing terms currently being decided on by the market at large: AEO (Answer Engine Optimization) and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) It really annoys me the ind…
-
comment
Comment #46935151
> i'm actually not sure which is more risky: holding bitcoin or real estate Both can have wild swings in valuation, but at the end of the day, you still hold something by owning re…
-
comment
Comment #45211621
> anyone know of an iPad ssh client with mouse support? Prompt 3 from Panic
-
comment
Comment #44924720
As someone who has owned every single Apple Watch model/generation and love the hardware, I agree with GP on the terrible UX of the app grid.
-
comment
Comment #44499452
> it's also very much not, because it always sounds like it might be authoritative, but you could be reading something hallucinated I keep hearing this repeated over and over as if…
-
comment
Comment #44499437
> The truth is, if there was no AI tech developed, we would not need to regulate it so that greed does not take over. Same could be said for the Internet as we know it too. Literal…
-
comment
Comment #44295289
You aren’t missing much if you just skip it
-
comment
Comment #44295279
You got past the grey text on gray background? -_-
-
comment
Comment #44256669
The level of hallucinations with o3 are no different than the level of hallucinations from most (all?) human sources in my experience. Yes, you definitely need to cross check, but …
-
comment
Comment #44256611
> And nobody outside those companies knows how they work. I think you meant to say: And nobody knows how they work.
-
comment
Comment #44254120
The saying goes: From 90% to 99% is a 10x reduction in error rate, but 99% to 99.999% is a 1000x decrease in error rates.
-
comment
Comment #44099923
People (including me) said this for a long time about Yahoo! too. Kinda ironic they both merged and basically died together… Yawho!?
-
comment
Comment #43887088
> The bandwidth between macs isn't enough to do inference effectively. While it’s certainly no where near the memory bandwidth, 80Gbps is on par with most high end, but still affor…
-
comment
Comment #43869204
Boring as the noun, not adjective. Also, Tesla was named that before Musk was involved, so it’s not his humor involved in naming both. Nikola Tesla is known for a lot more than jus…
-
comment
Comment #43841159
From source article… > For example, a lot of that 1.3 MW went into cooling the system and handling the hydrogen flow used to prevent contamination build up.
-
comment
Comment #43839987
> This is the power consumed by the light source for one photo tool on one line. Actually, it’s not if you read the linked article. Try harder with your indignant reply next time t…
-
comment
Comment #43831657
Yep, you did the simple math. 2MW generators are rather common place, they even come in portable (as in on a trailer) form.
-
comment
Comment #43830638
Thanks for sharing the link! 1.3MW really isn’t that high of a load though. Thats a very straightforward load to be able to support via diesel generators. As an example, a typical …
-
comment
Comment #43780901
But the type signature of: int -> int Is wrong. At minimum it’s: Optional[int] -> int Because you provided a default value so clearly it’s not required to provide an input paramete…
-
comment
Comment #43780875
> and, obviously, the inferred type (int -> int) is correct. No it’s not. It’s Optional[int] -> int at minimum. There are other completely valid signatures beyond that too.
-
comment
Comment #43771774
1) the code you wrote isn’t Python. 2) inferring the type is int isn’t guaranteed to be correct in this case
-
comment
Comment #43771366
Because it shouldn’t in function arguments. The one defining the function should be responsible enough to know what input they want and actually properly type it. Assuming an int o…
-
comment
Comment #43771077
So you want strong typing, but then are to lazy to properly type your function definitions?