Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jschlatter

jschlatter

HN member
Joined
Wed, Nov 13, 2013, 12:33 AM UTC
HN karma
303
Public activity
16 items

About jschlatter

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46700368

    They started with Ink but have since switched to their own renderer: > We originally built Claude Code on Ink, a React renderer for the terminal. [...] Over the past few months, we…

  2. comment
    Comment #32446786

    > They have the technical means to control what goes on there or not. They have less control than you may think. Any ethereum miners (or proof-of-stake validators) who block some c…

  3. comment
    Comment #28589978

    I do subscribe to channels and my feed is also flooded with these scams. (Though usually it is not this bad -- it got much worse starting on the day of SpaceX's Inspiration 4 launc…

  4. comment
    Comment #28589868

    You're not the only one. I've been getting annoyed by these, too. I was encouraged today to discover that youtube has a report history page that lets you know the outcome of your r…

  5. comment
    Comment #9412455

    LiteIDE was probably using gdb as a backend. gdb is not a very reliable debugger as of the last few Go releases. Here's a demo of a common failure mode of gdb on Go: occasionally r…

  6. comment
    Comment #9411625

    Thanks for the concrete example. The transformed source code that would get compiled for this example looks like: scope.Declare("x", &x) godebug.Line(ctx, scope, 3) x = 1 godebug.L…

  7. comment
    Comment #9411352

    "Also, having the debugging library alter the semantics of the program is 100% guaranteed to lead to bugs that are not visible when using the library, etc" Can you give an example …

  8. comment
    Comment #9411328

    Thanks! gopherjs is a really great project. This was my first time using it and I was impressed. I've considered putting it up as a permanent playground like http://play.golang.org…

  9. comment
    Comment #9411299

    Yeah, that should be relatively easy to do. We would just skip the "am I the goroutine under the debugger" check here [1] and add some kind of channel communication here [2]. The h…

  10. comment
    Comment #9411216

    Good question. I think https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9411158 is right, but I haven't looked at it closely yet. Thanks for bringing it up!

  11. comment
    Comment #9411147

    Author here. Yes, only one goroutine is paused at a time. I'm planning to add commands to show and jump between goroutines. Still sketching those out, though. Do you think it would…

  12. comment
    Comment #9411006

    > Another is that you may inadvertently corrupt or change the behavior of the code in an unintentional way if you modify it incorrectly I'm concerned about this, too. One of my nex…

  13. comment
    Comment #9410260

    Thanks, I didn't know that. The go/token docs don't say much about it. Do you know if there is better documentation somewhere?

  14. comment
    Comment #9410127

    Author here. I agree that this could cause surprises. Are there specific cases you have in mind? Two cases I have thought of are stack traces and logging that inspects the stack. I…

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #6722547

    I made a very similar extension last week ( https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/always-smile/fpaap... ) and encountered this issue, too. You can resolve it by going to http:/…