Viewing profile — jrvarela56
jrvarela56
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 05, 2011, 9:38 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,233
- Public activity
- 433 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jrvarela56
Shoot me an email if you'd like to chat (joservarelaf at gm).
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48707601
Sandboxing is a solved problem, there are dozens of providers of firecracker instances to run your agent in. The problem to be solved is how do you define task-specific least privi…
-
comment
Comment #48343517
“Teaching and engineer to understand the minutia of fund accounting well enough to build software for these firms is tough.” Sounds like you need a senior familiar with finance/acc…
-
comment
Comment #48263683
how do you measure if google’s engineering org is more productive than meta’s? What about comparing 2 startups/small teams? I think the discussion about methods (coding agents incl…
-
comment
Comment #47836257
A key term is ‘single player value’. One type of user needs to get benefits out of this marketplace as a tool so that you can use that engagement to solve the chicken and egg probl…
-
comment
Comment #47831193
Not sure if you mean 1) sub-agent definitions (similar to skills in Claude Code) or 2) CLI scripts that use other coding agents (eg claude calling gemini via cli). For (1) I'm tryi…
-
comment
Comment #47831107
I implemented a client for each so that the session history is easy to extract regarding the agent (somewhat related to progress of goal). Context: AGENTS.md is standard across all…
-
comment
Comment #47831102
I'm leaning in this direction. Recently slopforked pi to python and created a version that's basically a loop, an LLM call to openrouter and a hook system using pluggy. I have been…
-
comment
Comment #47830722
The past month made me realize I needed to make my codebase usable by other agents. I was mainly using Claude Code. I audited the codebase and identified the points where I was cou…
-
comment
Comment #47570523
I guess then if you did not receive instruction from the Buddha himself you cannot call yourself a true buddhist.
-
comment
Comment #47568726
It’s a feature not a bug!
-
comment
Comment #47393353
Would be awesome to see something like this for agents/harnesses
-
comment
Comment #47108868
Agree, i was going the vaultwarden route and figured this pattern seems better: https://fly.io/blog/tokenized-tokens/ Secrets are encrypted and the proxy decrypts on the fly if des…
-
comment
Comment #47108743
the LLM can use types just like the human
-
comment
Comment #46897309
The problem we have as software engineers (from an entrepreneur's pov) is that we mostly struggle with stuff that's removed from the client's problem. I mean it in terms of owning …
-
comment
Comment #46891274
I’ve been a year deep into my first job out of tech. There is a never ending slew of problems where being able to code, specially now with AI, means you have wizard-like powers to …
-
comment
Comment #46883125
Just wrapped up my own module for this. Remixed my worktree workflow with a lima wrapper. I wanted to go head first to giving Claude Code full autonomy but realized capability and …
-
comment
Comment #46550650
If they believe it would get them AGI they would risk it.
-
comment
Comment #45992723
I agree with you in spirit but this harms the potential for these new products to emerge. You’re saying you don’t want them to be able to accrue a data moat. It sounds good for use…
-
comment
Comment #45897138
If every other PC is more expensive, they will just increase prices.
-
comment
Comment #45757208
I have a directory called workspace where there’s a projects directory and the main area is for messing around. Just setup workspace once as a project.
-
comment
Comment #45701006
Spot on, this is a solid abstraction to build upon. I always felt MCP was a misstep in comparison to OpenAI’s focus on OpenAPI specs. HATEOAS is the principle that has become more …
-
comment
Comment #45567871
The AI of chemical engineering/material science?
-
comment
Comment #45487789
I think it’s a mix of social media and risk aversion, this article touches on the broader discussion as it impacts many kinds of design https://www.alexmurrell.co.uk/articles/the-a…
-
comment
Comment #45382657
I agree with you in spirit, but that’s not an answer you can apply when there’s someone else’s money at stake.
-
comment
Comment #45331686
My take on “Hard on purpose” is that it’s plausible deniability. It’s not for showing off, it’s to make the situation polite in a way that you can’t rationally attribute malice.