Viewing profile — jrswab

Yes, I've used it with on OpenAI compatible API from an internal LLM at my job.

Sorry, I need to update that. I just added MCP support a day or so ago.

You don't have all the Claude Code overhead. It only gets what you give it.

I'm excited to see how this plays out. Keep me updated on x(twitter)

Love to hear it! Thanks for checking it out and feel free to put up an issue on GitHub if you have any ideas for improvements.

Yes, I think it will be quite trivial to make a output allow list. That's a great idea!

I've shared a few flows I use a lot right now in some other comments.

That's my dream.

Not yet but it will be easy to add. If you need it can you create an issue in GitHub? I should be able to get that in today.

> Curious if you’ve experimented with workflows where agents produce artifacts (files, reports, etc.) rather than just returning text. Yes! I run a ghost blog (a blog that does not…

Thanks! Looks like sgpt is a cool tool. Axe is oriented around automation rather than interaction like sgpt. Instead of asking something you define it once and hook it into a workf…

This is not a replacement for either in my opinion. Apps like codex and pi are interactive but ax is non-interactive. You define an agent once and the trigger it however you please…

I'm happy you brought this up. I've been thinking about this and working on a plan to make it as solid as possible. For now, the best way would be to run each agent in a docker con…

Thank you for your service.

I am pretty proud of this one :)

nooo! lol but thanks, I'll go hunt it down.

I have a few flows I'm using it for and have a growing list of things I want to automate. Basically, if there is a process that takes a human to do (like creating drafts or running…

I've not heard of that before but after looking into it I think they are solving different problems. Dotprompt is a promt template that lives inside app code to standardize how we …

Exactly! I also made it to chain them together so each agent only gets what it needs to complete its one specific job.

Thanks for checking it out! And yes the tool is indeed catering to that crowed. It's a need I have and thought others could use it as well.

Not yet but is on the short list to implement. What would you need from a session for single purpose agents? I'm seeing it more as a way to track what's been done.

hahaha; this is what I was going for.

This is not an LLM but a Binary to run LLMs as single purpose agents that can chain together.

> how you would approach budget when using Axe Great question and it's something that I've not dig into yet. But I see no problem adding a way to limit LLMs by tokens or something …