Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jrandm

jrandm

HN member
Joined
Tue, Sep 15, 2015, 8:04 PM UTC
HN karma
170
Public activity
71 items

About jrandm

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #31499843

    > might be easier [...] just working at a bank Reminded me of this Key & Peele sketch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgYYOUC10aM Robber 2: So how do we get the money? Robber 1: T…

  2. comment
    Comment #29745480

    My biggest pointer would be to remember that Java & JavaScript aren't named that way by coincidence. They're two different approaches to a similar problem. Java suffers from Enterp…

  3. comment
    Comment #29710545

    > You can just look at pure user counts and see they are more usable/accessible overall User counts are a poor comparison when you consider how much the pool of potential users has…

  4. comment
    Comment #29400620

    The wording is probably something like "return after finished mission or within one year" because the equipment is loaned. I'd expect terms to vary wildly based on what the equipme…

  5. comment
    Comment #28579144

    I think most of the Monty Hall confusion comes from focusing too much on the question and the math and missing the important part: The confusing setup is part of the game! Essentia…

  6. comment
    Comment #28578687

    If it helps any, you're supposed to be misled by the setup. Monty could have asked the question as "Do you want to stick with the door you chose or do you think it's in one of the …

  7. comment
    Comment #28363391

    > they can always lend their own account to their kids, which would disable the mechanism Current technology means statements like this are not necessarily true (these are all refe…

  8. comment
    Comment #25924706

    My favorite working situations are when asking "stupid" questions and/or burning 6-12 hours on a subject is normalized and endorsed. I don't expect to live long enough to transcend…

  9. comment
    Comment #22693444

    > This may feel like cheating, but it’s okay! Examples are not merely reusable templates but tools for learning, hinting at subjects for study. “Breaking” an example by tinkering—c…

  10. comment
    Comment #22693143

    It would seem simpler and more effective, to me, to then tweet a link to the information.

  11. comment
    Comment #22692829

    > When collaborating over ambiguous topics where the potential to be misunderstood is high, you need to use the "richest" communication channel possible. Body language, facial expr…

  12. comment
    Comment #22692807

    Have you ever learned about something complex from a book? That would imply you don't need a whiteboard and 10 minute meeting in order to transfer information to one another.

  13. comment
    Comment #22692713

    If the pen is mightier than the sword; transferring long-form information via Twitter is like leaving hand grenades lying around. (The above sentence is 129 characters, feel free t…

  14. comment
    Comment #22688341

    I agree, looks like I misread it -- then some of this is still a mystery that's probably left to how things like Netscape and Internet Explorer used to work. Too bad!

  15. comment
    Comment #22687289

    I am not sure about Edge specifically, but as someone who tries to use mostly open source software: Digital Rights Management (DRM) requirements often directly conflict with licens…

  16. comment
    Comment #22686916

    HTML 4.01 is relevant to HTML5 in that it was the direct precursor to HTML5. Put another way, when I learned a lot of the HTML we all use every day there was no HTML5. By agreeing …

  17. comment
    Comment #22686850

    Thank you for laying that out clearly! I pointed out the irony of not giving an example|intended use in a technical document because if a line or two like that was in the HTML 4.01…

  18. comment
    Comment #22686827

    Thank you for pointing that out! does indeed have a default font-family of monospace there. And isn't defined at all! I'm not disputing this is all internally consistent or that I …

  19. comment
    Comment #22684943

    That's an odd nit to pick and I don't think it's accurate. In case you haven't heard the term sous-chef[0]: > Sous-chefs are in charge of making sure all kitchen equipment is in wo…

  20. comment
    Comment #22682622

    I'm guessing because they were inconsistently supported by browsers, because me too! I was even more surprised to see it in the HTML 4.01 spec, but if you look it makes more sense.…

  21. comment
    Comment #22682292

    I suggest giving a link to the rendered version of the quickstart sheet or some other "at a glance" list of the rendered elements. While I appreciate the dogfooding and clever pres…

  22. comment
    Comment #22682253

    > If I want to find anomalies among them, what would be the way to go? What is an anomalous JSON file other than a JSON file that does not meet the specification[0]? I have never g…

  23. comment
    Comment #22680534

    I really enjoyed this article and agree with other replies about the content. Additionally it's the first time I think I've seen a styled scrollbar that fit into a site (ie: wasn't…

  24. comment
    Comment #22664813

    https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/214629443 Has more information and browser support/feature tables. Thanks a ton for posting this. I don't use Zoom as much as I used to bu…

  25. comment
    Comment #22642211

    > The essay is funny . Per the SAT's own published rules, they are not graded on fact at all; purely rhetoric, vocabulary choice, and clarity. All of the prompts also usually inclu…