Viewing profile — jrabone
jrabone
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 27, 2011, 2:43 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,103
- Public activity
- 456 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jrabone
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #7786692
You get to fight my bacteria, and every humans bacteria, every day of your life. Not to a significant extent. In cases where people are exposed to other people's bacteria in quanti…
-
comment
Comment #7786532
No, it's standard UK practice, especially for the first 2 years after splenectomy. It does seem to vary around the world though.
-
comment
Comment #7786472
For hopefully the last time, I'm not talking about the bacteria in the product . All human beings defecate. Many (most?) clean themselves afterwards with their hands. If you do not…
-
comment
Comment #7786345
We provide them a home, and in return they protect and clean us. They don't want to destroy their home, they would die, too. Sorry but that is absolute, unmitigated rubbish. I spen…
-
comment
Comment #7786303
Not talking about the bacteria in the product, I'm talking about the faecal bacteria (your own personal gut microbes) that are still stuck to the skin afterwards due to not using a…
-
comment
Comment #7786152
Not talking about the bacteria in the product, I'm talking about the faecal bacteria (your own personal gut microbes) that are still stuck to the skin afterwards due to not using a…
-
comment
Comment #7785997
Soap and water is very good at removing faecal contamination. In the absence of small children and pets, and the taking of a prophylactic dose of antibiotics daily, my main concern…
-
comment
Comment #7785933
TFA doesn't contain enough detail about hand-washing as opposed to body & hair, in much the same way that most people don't like talking about wiping their backsides vs washing the…
-
comment
Comment #7785914
Thank you (I'm not religious either). I'm sorry you feel uncomfortable, that's not my intent at all. In purely objective terms, there's obviously a benefit to culling the weak. I w…
-
comment
Comment #7785828
I can't reply directly to "rosser" due to max comment depth, but fecal transplants don't generally involve introducing gut bacteria to anywhere other than the gut.
-
comment
Comment #7785679
Your fecal coliforms will kill other people, simply because they're yours, not theirs. They'll kill you if they don't stay in the gut (mine tried, along with a carbapenem-resistant…
-
comment
Comment #7785649
I'm still alive, that's as far as it goes. 30% + chance of recurrence and it's not like I can have those organs removed a second time. However, it's an improvement on the initial d…
-
comment
Comment #7785399
So anybody who happens to have a compromised immune system gets to fight your personalised microbes, perhaps fatally? How very ... Darwinian ... of you. Soap and water have saved m…
-
comment
Comment #7766587
Yep. I run Privoxy and a DNS resolver configured to be authoritative for the worst 5000 or so ad farms. Zips along nicely, and works for every machine on the LAN or via remote VPN.…
-
comment
Comment #7748958
It's UTF-8 being interpreted as raw bytes: "a-hat" is the 0x80 marker byte. A common fail is forgetting that Microsoft Word auto-corrects straight quotes (which are in ASCII) to cu…
-
comment
Comment #7737407
Anecdotally, tests for skin-contact carcinogens can be skewed because the lab mice are prone to develop skin cancers anyway.
-
comment
Comment #7737402
I think OP meant, "Why does the experiment always succeed on mice", not "Why do we perform experiments on mice".
-
comment
Comment #7639196
Presumably not ones assembled with lead-free solder? (not that the plastics are likely much safer by Californian standards, but still)
-
comment
Comment #7639186
I find it quite ironic that the 'machine' has failed dismally to reproduce this text correctly, by making the usual pigs ear of character encodings and rendering Ælfrid as �lfrid i…
-
comment
Comment #7634539
No, no they won't. Not my users, anyway, because I block your ads at the DNS resolver level by redirecting queries to my own Apache instance, which serves single pixel images or em…
-
comment
Comment #7592766
...right up to about 20 kHz, whereafter YOU CAN'T HEAR THEM. Hence 44 kHz sampling. Seriously, A/B test this, you might be surprised. Also if you think that's anything like a squar…
-
comment
Comment #7592153
First off, forget about MP3; I'm not arguing for a lossy standard. You can't get an 18 kHz square wave out of a system with 44 kHz sampling. You need at least 1 harmonic before it'…
-
comment
Comment #7591882
That's actually good design - the intention being that any clipping can only be due to software (which you can fix), not underpowered amplification hardware (which you can't).
-
comment
Comment #7591868
An 18 kHz square wave sampled at 44 kHz looks like an 18 kHz sine wave, everything after the fundamental frequency is well outside the Nyquist limit and will have been thrown away …
-
comment
Comment #7591811
From previous discussion, quoting 'jbk' VLC allows amplification of the INPUT above the sound that was decoded. This is just like replay gain, broken codecs, badly recorded files o…