Viewing profile — jqjester
jqjester
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 04, 2012, 1:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 5
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jqjester
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #9831050
Or perhaps an author fully understands their own work the same way a programmer knows how users will use their programs.
-
comment
Comment #7811733
In many cases, isolated testing does not require test doubles. There are alternatives to mocks: as long as the system under test is not manipulating its dependencies, you can get t…
-
comment
Comment #6391629
They don't have to be unbounded to be destructive to this estimation method, just large and unknowable.
-
comment
Comment #5918094
I'd rather have two simple things than one complex thing. In the codebases I've worked on, a lot of the complexity I see arose from people changing the meaning of existing code so …
-
comment
Comment #5534767
That sounds fair.
-
comment
Comment #5527581
Again, McConnell isn't disagreeing with Bossavit's claims about the Curtis 1986 citation. He concurs! "I never stated that Curtis 1986 was an 'empirical study.' Curtis 1986 is a br…
-
comment
Comment #5527333
I was originally responding to the challenge "aren't you taking Bossavit's claims on trust?" I'm differentiating between Bossavit's claims about the citations from Bossavit's analy…
-
comment
Comment #5506790
Sure - I'm pointing to the section titled "A Deeper Dive into the Research Supporting '10x'". I'm accepting one of Bossavit's claims on trust: he says that of McConnell's eight cit…
-
comment
Comment #5503983
Steve McConnell himself doesn't dispute Bossavit's claims about the earlier studies (for the most part), he just disagrees about the significance of those claims. See McConnell's r…