Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jqjester

jqjester

HN member
Joined
Wed, Apr 04, 2012, 1:15 PM UTC
HN karma
5
Public activity
9 items

About jqjester

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #9831050

    Or perhaps an author fully understands their own work the same way a programmer knows how users will use their programs.

  2. comment
    Comment #7811733

    In many cases, isolated testing does not require test doubles. There are alternatives to mocks: as long as the system under test is not manipulating its dependencies, you can get t…

  3. comment
    Comment #6391629

    They don't have to be unbounded to be destructive to this estimation method, just large and unknowable.

  4. comment
    Comment #5918094

    I'd rather have two simple things than one complex thing. In the codebases I've worked on, a lot of the complexity I see arose from people changing the meaning of existing code so …

  5. comment
    Comment #5534767

    That sounds fair.

  6. comment
    Comment #5527581

    Again, McConnell isn't disagreeing with Bossavit's claims about the Curtis 1986 citation. He concurs! "I never stated that Curtis 1986 was an 'empirical study.' Curtis 1986 is a br…

  7. comment
    Comment #5527333

    I was originally responding to the challenge "aren't you taking Bossavit's claims on trust?" I'm differentiating between Bossavit's claims about the citations from Bossavit's analy…

  8. comment
    Comment #5506790

    Sure - I'm pointing to the section titled "A Deeper Dive into the Research Supporting '10x'". I'm accepting one of Bossavit's claims on trust: he says that of McConnell's eight cit…

  9. comment
    Comment #5503983

    Steve McConnell himself doesn't dispute Bossavit's claims about the earlier studies (for the most part), he just disagrees about the significance of those claims. See McConnell's r…