Viewing profile — jpmoral
jpmoral
HN member- Joined
- Sat, May 16, 2015, 6:44 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 720
- Public activity
- 346 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jpmoral
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48826042
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48785403
Love the premise but couldn't get the night phase to work when I ran a one-shot. It quickly became repetitive thought that may have been just my lack of experience with the game.
-
comment
Comment #47291889
Aren't there already basic laws against officials profiting from their role?
-
comment
Comment #47245749
It's a horrible idea that will cause untold death and suffering among the civilian population.
-
comment
Comment #46419276
Ukraine: the Forging of a Nation by Yaroslav Hrytsak, translated by Dominique Hoffman Femina: A New History of the Middle Ages, Through the Women Written Out of It by Janina Ramire…
-
comment
Comment #45423077
Hello fellow listener, what games do you play? I'm currently running a play-by-post of Urban Shadows.
-
comment
Comment #44157128
Being backed into a corner? They're the aggressor.
-
comment
Comment #44079785
> he basically explained it was normal I think this is just him trying to justify it.
-
comment
Comment #43523214
I'm not sure what you're getting at. What I meant was that it was my impression that the argument over fluoride has been going on for longer and is bigger than this one case. How a…
-
comment
Comment #43521794
I'm not in the US but doesn't that downplay it a bit? Hasn't this been a contentious topic for some time? It's not like no one's been talking about it and Utah suddenly decided out…
-
comment
Comment #43521750
More like "there are pros and cons but there doesn't have to be a big political fight about it".
-
comment
Comment #43212471
> And possibly also because they do similar cyber attacks, so they don't hold it against them. "We spy on them so them spying on us is not a threat" does not make sense.
-
comment
Comment #42897992
The board shows the moves, and the right side lists them in notation along with some commentary. On move 61 Black blunders, allowing White a mate-in-1. White misses it, however, al…
-
comment
Comment #42897286
I encourage you to learn the notation! It's not difficult and will open up a wealth of resources: books, articles, videos, etc. As for the mate in 1, it's in the analysis next to t…
-
comment
Comment #42839265
What do they have to say about it?
-
comment
Comment #42651433
> the company would be getting “back to our roots around free expression” to allow “more speech and fewer mistakes.” Regardless of anyone's opinion on this move, as a long-time use…
-
comment
Comment #42356149
Wasn't a large part of that caused by the de-Baathification of the government and security forces?
-
comment
Comment #42220352
Just because an article focuses on one topic doesn't mean the subject is being singled out.
-
comment
Comment #42059665
I don't agree it was reasonable that Ukraine couldn't strike airbases when it had the chance. Meanwhile it's Russia that is escalating: targeting civilians on a mass and individual…
-
comment
Comment #42059633
Were nukes launched after the Kursk offensive? That eas a bright red line if Russia ever had one.
-
comment
Comment #42058303
The West's drip-feeding of support and arbitrary restrictions on the use of weapons was a disaster.
-
comment
Comment #42058232
Regardless of your views on DEI, why should that be up to the government?
-
comment
Comment #42050141
I'm not sure what any of that has to do with my question. The person I replied to said that from what he knew worker rights were somewhat better in the US so I asked for examples. …
-
comment
Comment #42036939
That compensation is better isn't in dispute. My question is about worker rights, how much of the stuff you posted is just your company vs US law? Are you protected better by law t…
-
comment
Comment #42032754
> Australia seems to have worker rights that make most of the US look decent by comparison This is the first I've heard anyone say that. Can you elaborate? We've got more leave (se…