Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jpeloquin

jpeloquin

HN member
Joined
Thu, Apr 09, 2015, 6:46 PM UTC
HN karma
568
Public activity
244 items

About jpeloquin

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47339369

    Post-mandate, I've been submitting to closed access journals and getting OA on the side for free due to the mandate. Pre-mandate, I only submitted to paid OA journals, and paid ~ $…

  2. comment
    Comment #47256250

    The article's discussion of how the open access mandate works is wrong. Federally funded research, when published (even in a closed-access journal) must be deposited in https://pmc…

  3. comment
    Comment #47251990

    Is the goal to get rid of the journals or ensure open access? Because the US already has open access mandates for federally funded research. Immediate and without embargo. https://…

  4. comment
    Comment #44932534

    Evaluating a function using a densely spaced grid and plotting it does work. This is brute-force search. You will see the global minima immediately in the way you describe, provide…

  5. comment
    Comment #44916755

    From main text: > Discussions with different stakeholders suggest that many currently perceive systematic fraudulent science as something that occurs only in the periphery of the “…

  6. comment
    Comment #44637609

    True, but the RF coils do get turned on & off. Heating of non-magnetic metal from the radio waves used for scanning is another concern, not just magnetic force.

  7. comment
    Comment #44228004

    > Don't we have decades of research about the improvements in productivity and correctness brought by static type checking? It seems messy. Just one example that I remember because…

  8. comment
    Comment #44145473

    Even extremely privacy-conscious authors could submit their paper to the service at the same time they publish their preprint v1, then if the service's feedback is useful, publish …

  9. comment
    Comment #43974397

    Industry research is generally R&D (applied science, engineering research), not basic research (basic science). Not to disparage either; both are needed, but they are quite differe…

  10. comment
    Comment #43973577

    Multiple comparisons and sequential hypothesis testing / early stopping aren't the same problem. There might be a way to wrangle an F test into a sequential hypothesis testing appr…

  11. comment
    Comment #43947942

    Publications with public funding have already escaped the paywall, partially as of 2013 and completely as of this year: https://par.nsf.gov/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ https://o…

  12. comment
    Comment #43939477

    Once something has a predictable ROI (can be productized and sold), profit seekers will find a way. The role of publicly funded research is to get ideas that are not immediately pr…

  13. comment
    Comment #43799186

    The median sample size of the studies subjected to replication was n = 5 specimens ( https://osf.io/atkd7 ). Probably because only protocols with an estimated cost less than BRL 5,…

  14. comment
    Comment #43359354

    I can confirm that some (30%?) mechanical and biomedical engineers follow the described problem "solving" strategy exactly. It's not just software engineers.

  15. comment
    Comment #43259072

    Prioritize work by ROI and alignment with the institution's mission, communicate the prioritization to relevant decision-makers in your management chain, and actually follow throug…

  16. comment
    Comment #43246027

    > Well, obviously the part-time thing will bring a reduction in my institutional teaching and admin duties. I have to say there is uncertainty about how much relief will arise in p…

  17. comment
    Comment #43098084

    Securing the funding often means writing a research plan that is interesting and convincing enough to be selected for funding in a competitive review process (80–97% rejection rate…

  18. comment
    Comment #43043323

    The upvote and downvote buttons are a couple millimeters apart on mobile and there's no feedback (that I've noticed, anyway) regarding which one you've pressed. There's probably a …

  19. comment
    Comment #42799051

    Well, the authors' byline says they're from Northeastern University, Shenyang 110169, China and Faculty of Management and Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024,…

  20. comment
    Comment #42753041

    Right, "sharing" here must mean DNA that was cloned from the same ancestral DNA strand, not merely that it shares the same informational content. I got lost in the analogies that f…

  21. comment
    Comment #42751538

    Based on the information I found, the % difference between two randoms humans in terms of base pairs (including non-coding DNA) is even less than the difference in terms of genes, …

  22. comment
    Comment #42750782

    The concept of indirect fitness must be more complicated than explained here. The article explains it as a worker bee sharing 75% of her genes with her sisters, but only 50% with a…

  23. comment
    Comment #42732732

    Shifting the topic from research misconduct to good laboratory practices, I don't really understand how someone would forget to take pictures of their gels often enough that they w…

  24. comment
    Comment #42729795

    Recipes like these aren't useless, but yes, they really need to be prefixed with whether they expect to start from a clean work tree and empty staging area. Or describe what they'l…

  25. comment
    Comment #42658825

    > Or, better yet, the gay satanic-panic currently gripping half the country, and the insane culture war being waged around it. You can't actually believe that all those people who …