Viewing profile — joskvw
joskvw
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 30, 2023, 3:15 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 12
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About joskvw
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49025801
I hated paper until I found a decent pen (frixion erasable, mediocre) and paper (Lemome grid notebook, very good). It's still harder than typing, but I've found nothing better for …
-
comment
Comment #48272718
"Absolutely shouldn't" is silly. - Browser vulnerabilities are non-trivial. - Mullvad browser's proxy feature only works if you're connected at the OS level, which helps mitigate b…
- story
-
comment
Comment #44476243
Dedicated stormwater infrastructure separate from sewage pipes solves the problem. You can also build tanks to hold overflow.
-
comment
Comment #36271496
My bad, sorry about that.
-
comment
Comment #36271487
This is a valid approach, but it might lead to a more complicated setup compared to the alternative approach shown in the article (example.com/5678).
-
comment
Comment #36271453
If you enter google.com in your browser and login, unless you misspelled the domain and that didn't get flagged by anything, you'll be fine. If a relative that doesn't know much ab…
-
comment
Comment #36271381
I agree that U2F/webauthn/FIDO2 is superior (in terms of security and in most cases convenience) in basically every way. This is an alternative approach that is less secure than we…
-
comment
Comment #36271229
That's a really good post, interesting read. This is similar in some ways but I don't see how their approach protects the user from more advanced attacks (an attacker could still s…
-
comment
Comment #36271159
Yes, it is. This system is primarily meant to counter phishing attacks that use similar domains. I should have clarified that in the post.
-
comment
Comment #36249696
This is the first blog post I've put on HN. Feedback is appreciated.
- story
- story