Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — joshlambert

joshlambert

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 22, 2017, 5:47 PM UTC
HN karma
65
Public activity
39 items

About joshlambert

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #35015487

    > "Advanced" search is completely useless as you can't really search for code. @deng - thanks for the feedback. I am on the Product team for our Search service, code search is not …

  2. comment
    Comment #26247435

    @cmckn - PM @ GitLab here - sorry to hear you had a poor experience with running our GitLab chart on k8s. We've been trying really hard to make this easier, but there is still some…

  3. comment
    Comment #24071843

    Hi, GitLab product manager here. I'm sorry that we haven't provided a good experience. We try really hard to make sure GitLab deployments "just work", and clearly it does not for e…

  4. comment
    Comment #23703338

    Thanks for the feedback entha_saava. GitLab.com is indeed slower than GitHub.com today, and we need to provide a better experience for our users. Improving frontend performance is …

  5. comment
    Comment #23276096

    Please read through the upgrade notes for 13.0 as there are some important changes like PG11 being a minimum requirement. As for the actual upgrade, you should be able to follow th…

  6. comment
    Comment #21001555

    The breakdown is probably close to the percentage of paying versus open source customers that we have. We are working to better educate our users on the value that our paid version…

  7. comment
    Comment #20998922

    Hi, we do believe in the single application offering the best long term user experience and outcomes, but do understand that all of our features may not work for everyone. This is …

  8. comment
    Comment #20998123

    Hi - I'm sorry for the experience you had. I'm the PM for our Runner team, and we're focusing our next milestone purely on fixing some high priority outstanding bugs, that have bee…

  9. comment
    Comment #20995942

    Hi - thanks for the feedback, we aren't where we want to be with performance. We are working hard to improve responsiveness and memory consumption, and have a recently started a te…

  10. comment
    Comment #20940001

    Hi - just wanted to confirm that this issue has been addressed and will be included in our 12.4 runner release. MR: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-runner/merge_requests/1...

  11. comment
    Comment #20930366

    Hi - we've been discussing how to better anchor these on quantitative data, rather than the subjective opinion of GitLab PM's. You can see some of the discussion here ( https://git…

  12. comment
    Comment #20928736

    Thanks for the additional information. The `git_data_dir` and gitaly configuration changes are indeed why we've started requiring moving to the last minor version first. The 10.x t…

  13. comment
    Comment #20924698

    Hi, I'm a PM for our linux packages. I'd love to learn more about the cryptic issues and vague errors mention. We've put a lot of effort towards making the upgrades as painless as …

  14. comment
    Comment #20924555

    Thanks, and please keep up the feedback. =)

  15. comment
    Comment #20924546

    Merge request to link to our definition of PNPS: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/www-gitlab-com/merge_requests/... . Should be merged momentarily.

  16. comment
    Comment #20924371

    Thank you for the feedback. We aren't happy with performance and we are working hard to improve it. We have two major projects under way, switching to Puma ( https://docs.gitlab.co…

  17. comment
    Comment #18853596

    We have established teams for each of our DevOps stages: https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/ Package encompasses both the Container Registry, as well as other reposit…

  18. comment
    Comment #18853334

    I'm sorry this has taken so long, but we are working on some foundational API's to manage and list images right now: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/55978 . I've als…

  19. comment
    Comment #17668222

    slap_shot one of our major goals is to provide a solution that startups and small companies can utilize to start putting their data to work. It shouldn't take weeks of effort, a da…

  20. comment
    Comment #17605559

    Thanks for watching mfer! Kaniko certainly doesn't address all of the challenges with building containers securely, but I think it's the best solution available _today_ that suppor…

  21. comment
    Comment #17377545

    We've had Mattermost integrated for quite some time, it predates the gitter acquisition. It's in use by around 5% of our installations and has a passionate userbase.

  22. comment
    Comment #16922303

    samm we are indeed making all components that are not core gitlab services optional. You will be able to turn them off with a simple `prometheus.enabled=false`. Thanks for giving t…

  23. comment
    Comment #16899671

    jancsika, totally understand the forking workflow is not ideal right now. Thanks for sharing your use case and using GitLab. We are tracking more formal support for this here: http…

  24. comment
    Comment #16899033

    If it is a forked project, CI should run in their own project I believe. It should not run on your Runners.

  25. comment
    Comment #16899024

    Quick note, the existing Let's Encrypt integration does not support Pages. We are working on it, but it's worth noting Pages has multiple modes it can run in. One is by setting up …