Viewing profile — josephpoon
josephpoon
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jun 13, 2015, 11:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 112
- Public activity
- 23 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About josephpoon
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29670956
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, systemd/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, systemd plus Linux. Linux is not an …
-
comment
Comment #12092363
Sorry Greg! I didn't mean it in the sense that Blockstream is planning for a hub at all! I was being sarcastic, but perhaps that wasn't conveyed properly in text. I thought the "if…
-
comment
Comment #12091958
Cheers! :D If you have any questions, do send me an email. I'm working on making the explanation better so feedback is always appreciated.
-
comment
Comment #12091950
No need for username/passwords. The flow would literally be you paid? You're done. No more per-website API tokens. Pay per website you visit, you visit a lot of different websites.…
-
comment
Comment #12091913
The presumption would be the underwriting risk is batched and pushed to one point (the exchange point). It's economically feasible to underwrite a single transaction for hundreds o…
-
comment
Comment #12091903
I thought their minimum was $0.01 last I checked, I stand corrected! Venmo also explicitly discourages you from sending money to people whom you don't have a social relationship wi…
-
comment
Comment #12091884
Let's say you're Alice. You have a channel open with Bob. Bob is connected to Carol (OKPay). You update your channel to tell Bob, I will pay you conditional upon a proof that you p…
-
comment
Comment #12091860
The fun part of the Lightning Network is that you're actually exchanging bitcoin transactions. You're just keeping a local cache and electing when to broadcast it. It's flipping th…
-
comment
Comment #12091842
Ah yeah, that's a good point, I totally forgot about them, thanks! I think the big difference here is that obviously decentralization is nice, but the real issue is that Linden cou…
-
comment
Comment #12091822
For the HN crowd passing by, here's why this stuff could be interesting to you. It's not possible to do extremely small micropayments on bitcoin directly as people use it today. Bi…
-
comment
Comment #12091770
Not sure why it's posted again, but we might have some announcements soon :D
-
comment
Comment #12091767
The Lightning Network is blocksize agnostic. I haven't been arguing on either side of the blocksize debate.
-
comment
Comment #12091756
Our implementation will not be biased towards Blockstream's hub if they ever make one. In fact, it's designed to work in a scale-free network topology. You can find it at https://g…
-
comment
Comment #12091749
What are you talking about? I don't control the Bitcoin codebase at all. I don't have commit access to Bitcoin's repo.
-
comment
Comment #10914675
Lightning Network for Bitcoin uses Bitcoin's scripting, as it uses real Bitcoin transactions.
-
comment
Comment #10914673
You are wrong. Lightning works by using smart contract logic. For Bitcoin in particular, that involves using Bitcoin scripting using real Bitcoin transactions. That blogpost is bas…
-
comment
Comment #10793316
I agree wholeheartedly, all aspects of scalability needs to be (are being) looked at, with an eye for practicality. Hopefully, LN will reduce the load on-chain for people currently…
-
comment
Comment #10792944
The paper never refers to hubs, the necessity of a handful of entities routing payments a-la Visa has never been part of the design. There are certainly more connected nodes, but t…
-
comment
Comment #10792302
I'm presuming 3dfan is assuming some kind of split in merchant/exchange acceptance, I agree this is less likely, though. However, in a hardfork, you can be sure there will be some …
-
comment
Comment #10792290
It's already infeasible to directly make a single spend of $0.0001 on the blockchain itself (transaction fees are $0.02-$0.05).
-
comment
Comment #10792282
This is correct. The simplest way to do this would be to include in your transaction a spend deriving from the coinbase block reward after the fork.
-
comment
Comment #10792264
> It seems I wasn’t the only one with this concern as there’s been a fairly recent pivot away from the hub-and-spoke network topology to a more organic, wallet-to-wallet routing. T…
-
comment
Comment #9713121
>Instead I'd rather see people try to fix the problem of it being expensive to spend bitcoin sourced from many small inputs. Lighting does this. With a single blockchain transactio…