Viewing profile — josaka
josaka
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 30, 2012, 2:49 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 560
- Public activity
- 147 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About josaka
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43018246
I suspect it's, in part, because humidity is low. The fab needs to tightly control humidity and temperature. Pulling water from air is energy intensive. Facilities team in the fab …
-
comment
Comment #38209394
My intuition matches yours. It's abundant enough to find its way into alloys for jet engine blades at single digit percentages: https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/science-…
-
comment
Comment #35717732
Same fab, same experience. I would add that a deep understanding (and ability to explain) statistics was more critical than understanding the underlying device physics for most rol…
-
comment
Comment #35474884
Lawfare did a nice analysis of whether Section 230 shields model hosts (likely no): https://www.lawfareblog.com/section-230-wont-protect-chatgpt Professor Volohk has a public draft…
-
comment
Comment #34478620
It would be wonderful if it was easy for most people to represent themselves. My sense is most people struggle to express themselves precisely and clearly enough to avoid being at …
-
comment
Comment #33553452
Customers with assets in custodial accounts of an exchange that goes bankrupt are likely general unsecured creditors, and the assets are probably property of the bankruptcy estate.…
-
comment
Comment #33110014
Yes, but in practice, this is just an opening offer in a negotiation. Parties will typically counter with something like: depose me in my home town for no more than x hours, and I'…
-
comment
Comment #32359572
A related issue is whether the availability of AI as a tool for creating innovation should raise the bar for non-obviousness. Both effects could make it harder to obtain patents.
-
comment
Comment #31587818
This ruling did not survive on appeal: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=542088572460013...
-
comment
Comment #31053374
Bahy-Dole Act and DoD Federal Acquisition Regs. are the answer to your question about "who gets access to these patents" and should be the focus of reform if you find them inadequa…
-
comment
Comment #31032562
I think this might be the PCT application in question (same name as the founder, and about fusion): https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO20... Discusses an "or…
-
comment
Comment #30934190
It's a common tactic in patents in my experience. You're not going to sue yourself. So you describe your invention in the context in which a competitor would use it. Of course, thi…
-
comment
Comment #30011022
There are gaps, but in almost all cases in the US in my experience, non-inventor owners record their interest in pubic records at the USPTO assignment database to perfect title: ht…
-
comment
Comment #29514213
I think the sweet spot for some blockchain use cases is where contract enforcement doesn't work well. It's really hard to seek redress for diffuse, low-grade breach. A 10 million p…
-
comment
Comment #29514162
True, but there's value in reducing the number of parties you must trust to get something done. It's easy to imagine that, at the margin, there are a subset of collective action pr…
-
comment
Comment #29331759
After the TX grid failure last winter, it's probably not a coincidence that Samsung's new facility will be near ERCOT's operation center in Taylor, which manages the TX grid, and w…
-
comment
Comment #29031326
TSA's counsel argued that the asserted patent was obvious in view of one prior art reference that disclosed scanning trays and a second prior art reference that disclosed carts at …
-
comment
Comment #29026850
This is probably the key passage in the validity ruling: "Defendant’s disavowal in pretrial practice of having its experts combine prior art was a serious handicap at trial." Not a…
-
comment
Comment #29026731
Here's the ruling where validity is analyzed by the court (again, which has not been reviewed on appeal as far as I can tell): https://cite.case.law/fed-cl/129/25/
-
comment
Comment #29026548
The most recent ruling in this case is available here: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=506583781665731... Validity was addressed back in 2016, but has not been reviewe…
-
comment
Comment #29026364
Better to look at the claims, which define the scope of rights granted. That said, the broadest claim pretty much tracks this language. I wonder if the broadest claim survived, or …
-
comment
Comment #29004488
I think rpx and unified patents do something like this.
-
comment
Comment #29003913
You can, in some cases, sue for damages accrued up to six years in the past. You don't have to sue for those before the patent expires. You just stop accruing new damages when the …
-
comment
Comment #29003803
It's weird, but standard. These exchanges are a formal way of fleshing out what the parties do and do not dispute. Both sides limit what the agree to as much as they can with a str…
-
comment
Comment #28961058
It's a defense against trolls acquiring those patents and leverage to force license on transfer deals with other large cos.