Viewing profile — jopt
jopt
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Nov 11, 2011, 6:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 345
- Public activity
- 180 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jopt
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6072783
They sometimes do, even if you don't count shutting down the operations for a week every WWDC. Examples: * http://www.macworld.com/article/1167247/cook_apple_planning_... * http://…
-
comment
Comment #6047884
Or rather, to stop pretending we can put ourselves in other's shoes. Talking to eg. abortion opponents, I usually get the impression that they have done a few thought experiments. …
-
comment
Comment #5962254
My sentiment exactly. I cringed at the thought of an argument based entirely on that. The last part, however > George Bush famously proclaimed: “You’re either with us, or against u…
-
comment
Comment #5944781
The second option (MITM through access to the public key server) is not comparable to the first. Targets would have to be singled out and surveilled in advance of the messages, whi…
-
comment
Comment #5897973
Take the lady that wants a fur coat a few sizes too big.
-
comment
Comment #5896527
> I just don't buy the ad hominem/smear angle when the things reported thus far have been rather banal facts that thus far have gone uncontested. In my view, neither the banality n…
-
comment
Comment #5885038
I agree these are interesting details, and I'm happier for knowing more about the people involved. However, I also believe that these facts are smears. They are being published not…
-
comment
Comment #5848514
"Most of the time, most people are not crying in public, but everyone is always in need of something that another person can give, be it undivided attention, a kind word or deep em…
-
comment
Comment #5292201
Spam filter. It's disappointing someone seriously believes this is some sort of "objectionable content" censorship. Namely because that's easy enough to test: "barely legal teens" …
-
comment
Comment #5155927
This isn't selective enforcement, just evaluating each case individually. Those enforcing a law are typically free to find different answers (punishments) to similar questions (cri…
-
comment
Comment #5086515
> However you feel about copyright Hm. This makes it sound like your point stands regardless of personal ethics; as though > profitting off of the distribution of other peoples wor…
-
comment
Comment #5006971
This just goes to show that the previously known as Metro look can be overdone just as badly as rich leather and linen.
-
comment
Comment #4963007
Well said. Furthermore, let's try to root out these beliefs early. It's easy for great power structures to form around them if left unchecked.
-
comment
Comment #4897650
It's probably not just a dollar figure; the terms have to be favourable concerning user data etc.
-
comment
Comment #4897642
Legally speaking (student, IANAL), product safety and advertising are separate areas of legislation. Advertising doesn't do much to the deal you enter into when you buy something, …
-
comment
Comment #4897630
What's the disclaimer for? If we keep doing disclaimers wrong like this nobody will ever pay them any attention.
-
comment
Comment #4892707
Wild speculation.
-
comment
Comment #4892632
More like reimplementing a shell from within a shell and running your program on the latter.
-
comment
Comment #4891776
That sounds like a great reason to improve the tools.
-
comment
Comment #4891770
Why? Is this how philosophy is or how it ought to be?
-
comment
Comment #4886094
Safari renders both sides as rgba(72, 72, 72, 1.0). I have no idea why. Perhaps (ironically) a dithering algorithm gone wrong. In chrome the divide is visible.
-
comment
Comment #4881079
I apologise for ever posting this trainwreck of statistical reasoning. I don't know what I was thinking.
-
comment
Comment #4869980
If access were all that mattered in a platform, you could make the leap from "less accessible platform" to "stupid". I'd personally probably look at a few more dimensions before co…
-
comment
Comment #4869975
If you really don't follow, he probably refers to the con hoc ergo propter hoc argument of "this means tablet-native journalism is impossible!" What else could it be? I get the fee…
-
comment
Comment #4869964
55% is just as close to 50% (coin toss) as 60%.