Viewing profile — johnmcelhone
johnmcelhone
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 27, 2019, 9:51 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 553
- Public activity
- 14 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About johnmcelhone
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43659333
Thanks for the feedback! Will work on some updates for the hero backgrounds. On your point about local code vs. API: - We handle all the authentication, rate limiting, and API diff…
-
comment
Comment #43658176
Fixed, thank you!
-
comment
Comment #43658173
Didn't catch the pricing bug, will update right now. A few others have also mentioned about the Grok & Groq confusion. Will think through some ideas here and update. Appreciate the…
-
comment
Comment #43658137
That was my bad - just fixed that mistake. Thanks for catching it! Will explore some more ideas for the Groq & Grok part too.
-
story
Show HN: Lunon – Instant model switching across LLMs
Hey HN! We built Lunon to make LLM development way less of a headache. Ever wanted to see how different models handle the same prompt without all the setup hassle? That's what we f…
- story
-
comment
Comment #33914573
This is correct. The brightness of the stars made them a bit difficult to identify by eye, I'm sure someone more familiar with sky charts could have done it. The constellations hel…
-
comment
Comment #33913992
You don't actually need the focal length, it doesn't help accuracy that much but can help you line up the sky to the photo a bit quicker. Anyway, if we did, all that info was in th…
-
comment
Comment #33913312
I did mention this later in the thread - was just a fun experiment to see if locating it was possible if we didn't know
-
comment
Comment #33913247
The process can still be done using entirely the star pattern and no Google Maps. There wasn't any reason to exclude other information I could use, so I didn't.
-
comment
Comment #33913194
You're right, it wasn't too difficult to guess the location without the stars. The base did happen to be right in-between the 34 and 35 degree lines (34.6 lat), and you can estimat…
- story
-
comment
Comment #27188240
Want medium res (10m), Sentinel-2 imagery is your best bet. Won't cost you a penny. https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/eo-browser/ Looking for higher resolution (3m), the only viable op…
-
comment
Comment #27188171
I believe 3m res data from them is around the $2 per square kilometre mark, however varies wildly depending on scale