Viewing profile — johndoe42377
johndoe42377
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Mar 15, 2020, 4:13 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -22
- Public activity
- 169 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About johndoe42377
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29103344
This is russian propaganda bullshit. The claim that SSL is not necessary is also bullshit, since traffic will be unencrypted after leaving an exit node. Fuck off, Ivan, back to you…
-
comment
Comment #27946259
Property of what?
-
comment
Comment #27832151
This is a double barrel idiotic question. First of all, there is no other universes. More precisely, there is no way to know or even assume the existence of other. Second, pi is a …
- story
-
comment
Comment #27791824
Against the fundamental notions of product types, records, unions and intersections, binary relations? Idiots, idiots everywhere.
-
comment
Comment #27762110
That must be wrong. There are no time measuring machinery and no notion of time. Frequency, by the way, is not a synonym for time.
-
comment
Comment #27762059
I am Jack's absolute lack of surprise.
-
comment
Comment #27737770
This is are a meaningless questions. One cannot calculate any such odds in principle. It is an application of a wrong concept. The real answer is that in cannot be known, again, in…
-
comment
Comment #27735297
This is the top, lmao
-
comment
Comment #27456777
No, it is not. There must be a logical flaw somewhere in the middle. There are always factors out of consideration (they are evolving as you calculate) so probabilities will be alw…
-
comment
Comment #27456676
> or decreasing by (1-f) when you lose This is wrong. It decreases by f , not (1-f). (1-f) is what /remains/ after each loss. Everything that follows is just wrong.
- story
-
comment
Comment #27363756
Location: Asia Remote: only Willing to relocate: Sweden or Norway only Technologies: classic FP: SML, Haskell, Scala, Erlang, FSharp Résumé/CV: https://karma-engineering.com/lab/wi…
-
comment
Comment #27339676
What should we talk about? Tokens are merely chips in the global network of online casinos. Ethereum is an amateur crap, technically like early PHP webshit. Btc is better but it in…
-
comment
Comment #27302133
So called modern science is the biggest bubble ever. Higher social status in exchange for sophisticated bullshitting, exactly as it were with clergy. The transition is done.
-
comment
Comment #27291551
If you don't mind, why exactly these speculations are qualified as a science (which implies reproducebility of results)?
-
comment
Comment #27291468
Oh, really? And how exactly they tested their predictions?
-
comment
Comment #27278060
This is a bloatware inside Emacs, while it should be a thin wrapper and a few modes. The whole point is to reuse Emacs APIs, not building up piles of crap with tens of dependencies…
-
comment
Comment #27260675
Come on, he has neither math not cs background. Only elusive daydreaming. Everything serious begins with a math model. Otherwise this is just handwaving, which is precisely what it…
-
comment
Comment #27260660
Why do we even take this punk seriously? I would like to read something from really bright and qualified people like Lamport, who have studied distributed systems for decades.
-
comment
Comment #27180032
Lol, there is no such thing as worth in a Ponzi scheme. There is no way to cash it out without a crash. More generally, an attempt to apply a concept of worth to a Ponzi is a type …
-
comment
Comment #27087601
Digital currencies is just a new age of surveillance and potentially control. Otherwise there is literally no point in them. And, of course, all crypto shitcoins failed at being "c…
-
comment
Comment #27073587
This is getting beyond rediculous . It is already crossed into embarrassment.
-
comment
Comment #26969009
Why, yes, behavioural economics leaves abstract bullshit in a dust.
-
comment
Comment #26942435
Why would they? The probability that a damaged by radiation copy of a gene ends up in a spermatozoa which wins the lottery is zero.