Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — johndoe42377

johndoe42377

HN member
Joined
Sun, Mar 15, 2020, 4:13 AM UTC
HN karma
-22
Public activity
169 items

About johndoe42377

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #29103344

    This is russian propaganda bullshit. The claim that SSL is not necessary is also bullshit, since traffic will be unencrypted after leaving an exit node. Fuck off, Ivan, back to you…

  2. comment
    Comment #27946259

    Property of what?

  3. comment
    Comment #27832151

    This is a double barrel idiotic question. First of all, there is no other universes. More precisely, there is no way to know or even assume the existence of other. Second, pi is a …

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #27791824

    Against the fundamental notions of product types, records, unions and intersections, binary relations? Idiots, idiots everywhere.

  6. comment
    Comment #27762110

    That must be wrong. There are no time measuring machinery and no notion of time. Frequency, by the way, is not a synonym for time.

  7. comment
    Comment #27762059

    I am Jack's absolute lack of surprise.

  8. comment
    Comment #27737770

    This is are a meaningless questions. One cannot calculate any such odds in principle. It is an application of a wrong concept. The real answer is that in cannot be known, again, in…

  9. comment
    Comment #27735297

    This is the top, lmao

  10. comment
    Comment #27456777

    No, it is not. There must be a logical flaw somewhere in the middle. There are always factors out of consideration (they are evolving as you calculate) so probabilities will be alw…

  11. comment
    Comment #27456676

    > or decreasing by (1-f) when you lose This is wrong. It decreases by f , not (1-f). (1-f) is what /remains/ after each loss. Everything that follows is just wrong.

  12. story
  13. comment
    Comment #27363756

    Location: Asia Remote: only Willing to relocate: Sweden or Norway only Technologies: classic FP: SML, Haskell, Scala, Erlang, FSharp Résumé/CV: https://karma-engineering.com/lab/wi…

  14. comment
    Comment #27339676

    What should we talk about? Tokens are merely chips in the global network of online casinos. Ethereum is an amateur crap, technically like early PHP webshit. Btc is better but it in…

  15. comment
    Comment #27302133

    So called modern science is the biggest bubble ever. Higher social status in exchange for sophisticated bullshitting, exactly as it were with clergy. The transition is done.

  16. comment
    Comment #27291551

    If you don't mind, why exactly these speculations are qualified as a science (which implies reproducebility of results)?

  17. comment
    Comment #27291468

    Oh, really? And how exactly they tested their predictions?

  18. comment
    Comment #27278060

    This is a bloatware inside Emacs, while it should be a thin wrapper and a few modes. The whole point is to reuse Emacs APIs, not building up piles of crap with tens of dependencies…

  19. comment
    Comment #27260675

    Come on, he has neither math not cs background. Only elusive daydreaming. Everything serious begins with a math model. Otherwise this is just handwaving, which is precisely what it…

  20. comment
    Comment #27260660

    Why do we even take this punk seriously? I would like to read something from really bright and qualified people like Lamport, who have studied distributed systems for decades.

  21. comment
    Comment #27180032

    Lol, there is no such thing as worth in a Ponzi scheme. There is no way to cash it out without a crash. More generally, an attempt to apply a concept of worth to a Ponzi is a type …

  22. comment
    Comment #27087601

    Digital currencies is just a new age of surveillance and potentially control. Otherwise there is literally no point in them. And, of course, all crypto shitcoins failed at being "c…

  23. comment
    Comment #27073587

    This is getting beyond rediculous . It is already crossed into embarrassment.

  24. comment
    Comment #26969009

    Why, yes, behavioural economics leaves abstract bullshit in a dust.

  25. comment
    Comment #26942435

    Why would they? The probability that a damaged by radiation copy of a gene ends up in a spermatozoa which wins the lottery is zero.