Viewing profile — johSho7w
johSho7w
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Feb 13, 2010, 4:37 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 15
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About johSho7w
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #1318784
> without first making reasonable and just efforts to find the owner and to restore the property to him See, the problem is that according to the law you quoted simply picking up a…
-
comment
Comment #1318474
It means that the DA and Jobs are buddies. Simple as that.
-
comment
Comment #1302704
It's not bias when an organization that believes bloggers are journalists makes a statement that it believes bloggers are journalists.
-
comment
Comment #1300068
That's interesting, but I don't think that's what positr0n was describing. The Washington Post reporter describes Gawker's work repeatedly as journalism. Even the photograph captio…
-
comment
Comment #1299599
How's that a conflict of interest? It's valid context, but in what ways are EFF obligations in conflict?
-
comment
Comment #1299476
Do you have any sort of specific criteria for what is considered a journalist? It seems like the discussion here tends to equate journalists with reporters and then speculate to wh…
-
comment
Comment #1299452
I think a bigger question is whether the warrant would have been issued/executed against his home if he didn't work from home. Somehow I doubt the DA would have had the balls to ra…
-
comment
Comment #1299421
This same old tripe again. Did Gizmodo return the phone to Apple immediately when Apple finally admitted it was theirs? Did Gizmodo demand payment from Apple in return for the phon…
-
comment
Comment #1299084
Are you talking about trade secrets or theft? Gizmodo never disputed that the phone was Apple's property and they returned it to Apple as soon as Apple claimed it. If Gizmodo physi…
-
comment
Comment #1298703
The question is the difference in public response at the two cases. Just FYI for the ESLs and reading-comprehension-impaired.
-
comment
Comment #1298488
If you lose your wallet and assume that credit card numbers are not compromised you're an idiot. Are you saying Gizmodo refused to return the phone to Apple claiming it was now the…
-
comment
Comment #1298346
So, how exactly is it necessary to test the phone while the user is inebriated with access to the public? They couldn't host a private party for that? Test it at workers houses? Wh…
-
comment
Comment #1296885
If these secrets are so valuable maybe Apple should rethink its policy of letting them walk out the door to go to a bar.
-
comment
Comment #1296872
If Apple is claiming trade secret protection, they need to demonstrate that they attempted to protect the secret. Apple authorized taking the phone into the public. These "secrets"…
-
comment
Comment #1296424
If a company can't keep its own secrets it should be their problem. We give protections to patents and copyrights for a reason.
-
comment
Comment #1277048
...and here I was thinking about X11 authority. Silly me.
-
comment
Comment #1258215
Not to mention that Apple had just burned Adobe with the whole ditching Copland fiasco. I'm sure Adobe was thinking, "Oh, sure yet another framework from Apple." Also, remember at …
-
comment
Comment #1248415
Don't you usually pay more for the "professional" cameras or the "professional" phones. Apple seems to play it the other way. Charging more for the dumber hardware.
-
comment
Comment #1243108
Are you saying they are supposed to leave the baby attached to the placenta while the afterbirth is delivered? I would imagine that remaining attached to the afterbirth as it is de…
-
comment
Comment #1243066
And yet: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34149853/
-
comment
Comment #1242691
After the cord is clamped, how is the blood on the other side expected to get into the baby?
-
comment
Comment #1237193
The problem with He is also why it's so useful--it doesn't react with anything. It's a bitch to filter because the only strategy you have is to get rid of everything else.
-
comment
Comment #1146773
How does anyone decide to trust mint.com? It gives me the security hebbie-jebbies and all their claims of security assurances make the jebbies worse. They're still storing accounts…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #1122561
Well, they do have hardware to seize a running server without shutting it down (by splicing into the power cables/power lines at the wall plate and introducing battery power). How …