Viewing profile — jmvldz

The explore step with Codex-5.3-Spark and Opus 4.6 Fast both feel incredible.

I don’t have much in the way of tests right now but I am building with Typescript and Rust so that catches many basic bugs. I don’t find the issue to be breaking other parts of the…

Interesting. I had not thought about a code review sub agent. I will give that a shot.

Haha fair enough. Fixed!

I'm trying to prototype extremely quickly and I'm working on my project alone so yes, often I accept PRs without looking too closely at the code if my local testing succeeds. I'm u…

I don't have a ton of tests. From what I've seen, Claude will often just update the tests to no-op so tests passing isn't trustworthy. My workflow is often to plan with ChatGPT and…

Ooh, that's a good title for another post! And yes, I agree with you. Initially I would barely read any of the code generated and as my project has grown in size, I have approached…

100% yes. QA'ing a bunch of LLM generated code feels like a mental flood. Losing that mental rest is a great way to put it.

"It isn't like programming. It is its own thing." You articulated what I was wrestling with in the post perfectly.

Ah interesting. I wonder if it's similar with Devin users.

I agree the branching sounds super cool!

Coding agents are the future and it's anyone's game right now. The main reason I think there is such a proliferation is it's not clear what the best interface to coding agents will…

This is cool! I like that you have a visual element for the agent working on multiple tickets at a time.

Very cool! Love the demo.

have you looked at Browser Use? https://browser-use.com/

I see what you mean. So do you think a pure tutorial would have been better? This is our first HN post so I was trying to strike a good balance between talking about what we think …

Ooh, fair point. Did it feel less compelling because we didn't mention that at the top?

Wow, the inference is insanely fast. This is amazing.