Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jmgrosen

jmgrosen

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jan 13, 2013, 2:37 AM UTC
HN karma
912
Public activity
244 items

About jmgrosen

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. story
  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #39642896

    Even at 23mph, a pedestrian's chance of death in a collision, in the US over the years 1994-1998, was only 10%: https://aaafoundation.org/impact-speed-pedestrians-risk-seve... I do…

  4. comment
    Comment #39555769

    Especially the Field model!

  5. comment
    Comment #38556840

    given the crackpot proofs received by coq-club, i imagine it would indeed

  6. comment
    Comment #37887226

    are there any documented cases of this actually happening in the wild?

  7. comment
    Comment #37821858

    Thank you for the self-promotion, Scheme for Max looks like something I’ve been wishing for for a long time!

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #37117551

    Use an existential type, usually called Some in Haskell: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/some-1.0.5/docs/Data-Som... The implementation of this type one has in their head (a GA…

  10. comment
    Comment #36746898

    yes: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/130136/The%20... (sorry for lack of details in my post, on mobile)

  11. comment
    Comment #35937166

    No, it’s not—-they’re passing in a “node”, not a list, which always contains both a head element and a (nullable) tail pointer. That’s why it can’t separate the head in the case of…

  12. comment
    Comment #35817638

    Some of you may enjoy this fantastic recent paper on how to win both the comprehension benefits of splitting lexer and parser AND the performance benefits of fusing them: https://w…

  13. comment
    Comment #35485754

    This is absolutely ridiculous. I love it.

  14. comment
    Comment #32152275

    I think more like 5.5 minutes: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=300+nautical+miles+%2F+...

  15. comment
    Comment #31170221

    The second page starts the "FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION"; the body weight quote above comes from section 12.3 of it and there is no mention of a weight exclusion in the discussion…

  16. comment
    Comment #28969013

    Very cool! Just a random thing I noticed reading through [1]: you might have a bug in how you calculate the magnitudes of the signals? When you assign the output of the low-pass fi…

  17. story
  18. comment
    Comment #27932207

    One would hope Microsoft wouldn't hire him due to his long history of rampant sexism, but, being realistic, they would not likely care.

  19. comment
    Comment #26516909

    Not sure whether I'd prefer to be Bond, or a pirate: archery, fencing, pistol, and sailing.

  20. comment
    Comment #25055101

    I worked the polls in Allegheny, and while the broad strokes are similar to what you described, there are definitely a few differences: - Most people fill out their ballot on paper…

  21. comment
    Comment #23704842

    It appears so! https://github.com/ms-jpq/gay/blob/95129960bc94f017648b93944...

  22. comment
    Comment #22177236

    Well, I will defer to your judgment! I’m by no means a type theory person. My understanding was that these features are how quotients are managed to be implemented. But perhaps tha…

  23. comment
    Comment #22174629

    My understanding is that this shows how vanilla Coq still can’t encode quotients well. This project relies on a PR [0] that breaks term normalization, which makes it highly unlikel…

  24. comment
    Comment #20718049

    It does say that multiple times: > It is believed that some of the crowd control devices are capable of emitting electric shocks in a bid to neutralise any perceived threat... > Th…

  25. comment
    Comment #20566335

    The wonders of Unicode: "Superscript One" has codepoint U+00B9.