Viewing profile — jksk61
jksk61
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jan 12, 2023, 1:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 57
- Public activity
- 56 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jksk61
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #41326739
Is a TL;DR available or at least some of the ideas covered? Because after 3 paragraphs it seems the good old "it is actually something resembling a cellular automata" post by Wolfr…
-
comment
Comment #41274114
funny paper, I still don't know what was the goal of it. It is evident to anyone that LLM can't perform any meaningful reasoning, why even bothering in building such an infrastruct…
-
comment
Comment #40721877
not even childish gambino ref saved it.
- story
-
comment
Comment #40262591
in fact it is nothing new.
-
comment
Comment #39837954
"you were supposed to destroy evangelisms not join them!"
-
comment
Comment #39196216
now the question is: what is the most complex* object that it is not turing complete? * let's say you have n distinct rules acting against a set S, the complexity is n. p.s. probab…
-
comment
Comment #39037605
bruh! with 100 mln elements in the dataset it is basically printing out previously known problems during testing.
-
comment
Comment #38923082
I don't get it, what's cool about it? Einstein notation seems good enough for most of the things and they are equivalent. Is there anything interesting (i.e. new) that this notatio…
-
comment
Comment #38899428
> What's the strength of play for the GPT architecture? It's impressive that it figures out the rules, but does it play strong chess? sometimes it is not a matter of "is it better?…
-
comment
Comment #38695419
it seems to try too hard on proving things have improved by white lying a bit. Some examples: * Environment: air quality in most places has continued to improve (and considering th…
-
comment
Comment #38625527
very nice!
-
comment
Comment #38542072
If you need an exponential number of coupled oscillators to construct a general purpose computer, then you don't have the exponential speedup.
-
comment
Comment #38542031
of course not, none is considering fusion as a reliable workable solution for the 2050 net zero goals. I mean they don't even consider opting out gas and oil until 2040s or even la…
-
comment
Comment #38534575
I don't know about you but I use chat gpt to solve captcha because I can't.
-
comment
Comment #38501928
yes it is an interesting read, however you should know that some of their "facts" are highly speculative and some were proven wrong in the last decade.
-
comment
Comment #38449977
color me surprised.
-
comment
Comment #38444352
also removing skip connections leads to a rougher loss landscape, hence it should be harder to find the optimal weights.
-
comment
Comment #38398443
I don't know, it is an opinion and it seems kind of well-founded (i.e. there's no evidence for groundbreaking research on OpenAI part except for scaling things up).
-
comment
Comment #38295132
I don't understand why investing money in something that it is reliable and not requiring major reworks on the electric grid would be beneficial, incredible! I am more baffled than…
-
comment
Comment #38268320
what a laughable sentence, there have been at least 2 near misses last year between starlink satellites and Tiangong. Also, if there's a collision, the smaller parts and debris wou…
-
comment
Comment #38159978
these kind of books are "philosophical" books. In the sense that the usage can be written/explained in other ways. For instance, monads are just a way to see that if you compose tw…
-
comment
Comment #38144468
well it could be useful in literature where there are way too many zhang...
-
comment
Comment #38127452
Nice, but what are the minimum requirements to run it locally?