Viewing profile — jkercher
jkercher
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Sep 13, 2022, 1:16 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 73
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jkercher
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48621270
I don't know man. It's just zero. Dereferencing it just crashes your program (assuming an operating system). This kind of just reads like a fear of pointers. Corrupted/out-of-range…
-
comment
Comment #48613545
Meh, I think NULL is fine in C. It's an extra, valid state to represent pointers at no cost. Unlike the more hand holdy languages, it's quite rare for a pointer in C to have the ab…
-
comment
Comment #48597676
Ha. I'm probably in the more anti AI camp, but if it could free us from the plague that is Python thinking, I might change my tune. 2 seconds might feel negligible in the real worl…
-
comment
Comment #48381803
Sam?
-
comment
Comment #48061381
You make that sound worse than it is. On the overall topic, you have 0 supply chain risk, and the whole thing is local. Also, your code from 2009 is still valid. That would be a fo…
-
comment
Comment #47539250
I too have used a similar strategy of packing variables together. I even came up with a name for it. I called it a "building."
-
comment
Comment #46923661
Tangentially related. Don't ever put "." in your PATH. I used to do this to avoid typing the "./" to execute something in my current directory. BAD IDEA. It can turn a typo into a …
-
comment
Comment #46742753
One of the advantages to the pointer + length approach is free substrings. This inline approach doesn't allow that.
-
comment
Comment #45758291
Couldn't agree more. I have a project at work from 2016 that builds multiple different HMIs (C++) along with 2 embedded systems (C). They all have to play nicely with each other as…
-
comment
Comment #45527599
I certainly would not use it prescriptively as I said originally. I wouldn't use any poker book prescriptively. You make your own style and pull pieces from others just like any ot…
-
comment
Comment #45522414
I don't think so. I don't play nearly as often as I used to, but I still do alright. Though, I usually play tournaments where "game theory optimal" can only get you so far. There i…
-
comment
Comment #45522277
Super System is old, but I wouldn't call it outdated. Definitely still worth a read. The more books you've read, the bigger your tool set. The key here is that it works in both dir…
-
comment
Comment #43977738
Rust and Zig are both perfectly fine languages. Odin wins on simplicity and familiarity for me. I'm most productive in C which is what I use at work. So, for me, it's a better C wi…
-
comment
Comment #43971534
When I first heard about Odin, I thought, why another C replacement?! What's wrong with rust or zig? Then, after looking into it, I had a very similar experience to the author. Som…
-
comment
Comment #41025011
What's naive?
-
comment
Comment #40686919
I'm not looking for an argument, but my knee jerk reaction to seeing 4 or 5 different answers to the question of getting python to C... Why not just learn C?
-
comment
Comment #40362535
clickhouse-local is pretty slick as well. You can operate directly on text files as if they were tables. I made my own toy text file database thing and thought I was cool because I…
-
comment
Comment #37507608
I think he's saying the text should be more muted like the copyright at the bottom.
-
comment
Comment #37485646
Cool. Let us software guys know when we get computers that are 1000x faster so we can write the next language/framework that is 1000x slower.
-
comment
Comment #33791623
I think he is getting at this part "non-mass scale platform." He's implying it only protects the big players that can afford the change.