Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — jiggunjer

jiggunjer

HN member
Joined
Thu, Aug 03, 2017, 2:25 AM UTC
HN karma
471
Public activity
544 items

About jiggunjer

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48667982

    And phone number verification too? So that's 3 hurdles to jump to just get opus.

  2. comment
    Comment #48597349

    Title says uri but post only about urls, a type of uri

  3. comment
    Comment #48568293

    In 2017. Wonder what it's like today.

  4. comment
    Comment #48441724

    Funny. When you input only milk and soy milk, it ignores the soy. If only soy, suddenly the butter needs to be vegan.

  5. comment
    Comment #48435732

    Thx oh and maybe don't call it sem. It's not really semantic, more like a big picture view vs the ground level git lines. How about "bye", short for bird's-eye?

  6. comment
    Comment #48431506

    Another potential use case: This may help jujutsu auto split a large revision into small orthogonal revs. Sometimes agent makes a monolithic commit and it's a lot of work to manual…

  7. comment
    Comment #48422777

    Literally what china is doing now

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #48333083

    Standardization. Who writes llms.txt? Everyone writes their own? Will agents still behave the same?

  10. comment
    Comment #48317702

    Biggest design bug imo is the workers need to register for the workflows they support, but will happily pull tasks from unrelated workflows if they're on the same queue. No way to …

  11. comment
    Comment #48292417

    Isn't split stack architectural, i.e. client heavy vs thin client. Not a hard TS feature?

  12. comment
    Comment #48244272

    I'd say cue is nicer, but the tooling available is even less mature.

  13. comment
    Comment #48230713

    "appreciation"

  14. comment
    Comment #48144381

    Me too! I got interested in category theory and how to express a logical model of "workflows" as a category. Then ai told me workflows are a monoid and not to bother.

  15. comment
    Comment #48022135

    I note the absence of a motivation.

  16. comment
    Comment #48020511

    Is there no upstream package repo like docker has.

  17. comment
    Comment #47994086

    That's objective metrics. Not an objective way to compare, which is the selection of metrics to include.

  18. comment
    Comment #47986566

    IME "real data work" doesn't involve notebooks.

  19. comment
    Comment #47851192

    Strange advice not to push the mega merge. It's what I call my release branch. One thing I like is there's many ways to achieve the same result. E.g. author uses a fancy rebase to …

  20. comment
    Comment #47830868

    Taking notebooks to a production environment isn't fun either. With ai there's no more excuse for using that coding crutch.

  21. comment
    Comment #47773054

    I think they're related. You can't have a custom kernel if you can't rebuild the device tree. You can't rebuild blobs.

  22. comment
    Comment #47766862

    I think the mental model is like C vs python. Git gives you a forensic trace back in time. jj gives you a story with chapters. Look under the hood you'll still see forensic map of …

  23. comment
    Comment #47735821

    Actually food water and shelter are free to those who can't afford it in many developed countries.

  24. comment
    Comment #47735806

    This, and owning a bank account, filing taxes, paying bills are all moving to internet only. Some coffee shops in china you can't even order or pay without their app.

  25. comment
    Comment #47719035

    Definitely not true about models knowing jj. I've had latest opus and gpt fail at revsets and fileset syntax, even hallucinating subcommands like jj move (maybe it existed before, …