Viewing profile — jhack
jhack
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Mar 17, 2011, 10:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,519
- Public activity
- 367 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jhack
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49211648
Rolling out data centers all over the place and they're paying billions for LESS energy supply. Geniuses.
-
comment
Comment #49109256
“People who disagree with me must be bots” is always a fun take.
- story
-
comment
Comment #49077924
"My primary concern is the risk that authoritarian governments—not solely the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), although the CCP is clearly the most capable threat—build AI models tha…
-
comment
Comment #49036283
> Bun is the quintessential AI slop project at this point. To call the Bun rewrite "quintessential slop" is all I need to know to not take this person or their project seriously.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48890665
Lower up-front cost and hardware longevity are the two major ones. Whenever GTA VI launches on PC, good luck running it on your $500 PC from 2020.
-
comment
Comment #48890547
“If I can't give people physical games as gifts anymore, why should I bother buying the new console?” “Man, Valve really does win by doing absolutely nothing while the rest of the …
- story
-
comment
Comment #48676006
This is going to happen more and more. AI is a tool that should make your employees more efficient not replace them outright. And if it doesn't make your employees better? I guess …
-
comment
Comment #48634635
The pricing is all out of sorts. Close to $500 more expensive than a PS5 for worse performance. I understand this is a PC and you can do other things with it, but if you're buying …
-
comment
Comment #48619262
Which then gets tossed into a compiler and who knows what kind of code that thing spits out. That's why I only support projects written in assembly by real programmers.
-
comment
Comment #48613688
"Even it that'd be the best code and design in the world, I won't use it. I don't trust it." Nothing about this sentence makes sense. What don't you trust about code you can see an…
- story
-
comment
Comment #48461485
Sometimes I wonder if any of this will even matter in a few years. How many of us compile code and then have to clean up the assembly, or even worry about what a compiler generates…
-
comment
Comment #48429019
You should post the results of your source code audit.
-
comment
Comment #48419278
"Disabling attribution of LLM-generated code is fraud, because you’re saying you wrote the code." Should there by attribution for Google or Stack Overflow copy/paste? Who should we…
-
comment
Comment #48361146
Bluesky is insufferable. Literally any issue in any program is labelled "#vibecoded" by these clearly genius-level engineers who've never shipped a bug.
-
comment
Comment #48342372
Is it weird that I want a mono version if this? Looks really great, really well designed.
-
comment
Comment #48323815
This is a great idea. Even if you're one of those developers squarely focused on getting the final result working, code quality still matters (to people and LLMs). Everyone should …
-
comment
Comment #48269242
Maybe don't use the most expensive models on the planet? Maybe use AI like a tool and not this black box that grants wishes?
-
comment
Comment #48239773
Low quality, bug laden code has existed long before LLMs and it'll continue to exist long after. Their rationale about avoiding future headaches could literally apply to any open s…
-
comment
Comment #48230373
This sounds like a gamechanger for speed and efficiency if it can scale up. "However, our models are nevertheless relatively small and trained on tiny amounts of instruction exampl…
- story
-
comment
Comment #47905619
[flagged]