Viewing profile — jfbaro
jfbaro
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Oct 05, 2017, 2:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 112
- Public activity
- 72 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jfbaro
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46857431
Me too!
-
comment
Comment #44612720
Great work!!
-
comment
Comment #42972499
They are getting shittier and shittier
-
comment
Comment #42779947
I was wondering if there’s a way to automatically measure calorie intake—like some kind of biosensor that could be worn on the body. Companies are investigating this I bet!
-
comment
Comment #37511850
Congratulations to all PG community!
-
comment
Comment #36418000
Can this be used in a way similar to “supercomputers” proposed for Haskel?
-
comment
Comment #36134413
coW? So devs can have their ephemeral databases in seconds at no cost? Only the reads and writes they use and the “delta” storage of their thin clone? Bitenporal support? Smart ano…
-
comment
Comment #35163451
Even if a GTP-X will be able to get my description of a system and because it understands the industry lingo and practices create a extremely optimized RUST code, why would we need…
-
comment
Comment #33198326
Congrats PG team and community
-
comment
Comment #32754415
Interesting. I am personally more interested in precise and diverse health sensors, that can measure my health in real time.
-
comment
Comment #32061248
Updated! Thanks
-
comment
Comment #32060431
I have seen this presentation from a company that used PG Full Text search for a pretty complex use case. Interesting -> http://matheusoliveira.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/p…
-
comment
Comment #32013338
Is this the start of a future where we can write high level code (Idris, Agda, Coq) and the resulting code will run as fast (and as safe) as RUST? Interesting.
-
comment
Comment #31759038
1. Shorter cold starts 2. Secure environment 3. Heavily tested in production These are good PROS of Isolate for Serverless Computing, IMHO.
-
comment
Comment #31483220
Great list. As I can add anything here, I will say: - Bitemporal support OOTB (storage would be more expensive, as temporal data needs more disk space) - CoW capabilities OOTB, so …
-
comment
Comment #31448793
orioleDB is another one
-
comment
Comment #31119277
Great work Amazon Web Services (AWS)! I am already waiting for V3.... Wish list: - Pay per transaction (Reads, Writes) + Storage, instead of per resource allocation (some competito…
-
comment
Comment #30842108
Many great things to be part of PG 15. Congratulations
-
comment
Comment #30790188
Thanks! It would be good to check it again with Graviton3.
-
comment
Comment #30582639
Thanks. Reshape is quite promising.
-
comment
Comment #30527624
The US controls the world. It is above any regulation or international law. Other countries have to comply with UN and other agencies... not the US. US will always find an excuse t…
-
comment
Comment #30493479
Congrats to Lambda team! Keep evolving the FaaS platform, especially regarding Cold Starts.
-
comment
Comment #30467051
That's amazing! Thanks for making this open source. Could this be extended to support temporal (and Bitemporal) tables? Some storage level optimizations could benefit performance a…
-
comment
Comment #30461942
Could reshape help with temporal table schema migration? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/71131800/how-to-avoid-br...
-
comment
Comment #30461889
Reshape is super promising! Great work!!