Viewing profile — jeffgus
jeffgus
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 01, 2016, 10:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 13
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jeffgus
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #41911384
yeah, could be. IBM has been working on AI for ages. They have been able to make a splash with events in chess and Jeopardy, but can't seem to keep up the interest. Of only IBM had…
-
comment
Comment #41909646
Why not? Seems to me that IBM is trying to differentiate their AI from others by offering a complete solution that can be self-hosted. The part that cannot be produced locally, the…
-
comment
Comment #35660784
Ah, AOLServer! I remember using it when it was NaviServer. I helped to launch my employer's website (packardbell.com) on NaviServer on Solaris way back then. Some of the things I l…
-
comment
Comment #35006515
You are correctly. I was imprecise. They were trusting another company to peer for them. They thought they were purchasing "CDN services". The problem is that one of those companie…
-
comment
Comment #35001192
But Netflix was NOT paying transit. They were paying for peering. Transit costs more. To reduce costs, they peered with large networks. The problem is that the company they paid to…
-
comment
Comment #35001146
That is my reaction. Am I missing something here? Are Net Neutrality rules getting in the way? I know when the NN topic was really hot, many were conflating treating the packets th…
-
comment
Comment #16477034
> I mean, sure, if you define "right" in that way, then you can say you have the "right" to literally anything. If? No, that is how rights are defined in the US. As long as a right…
-
comment
Comment #13554375
Yeah, docker, initially, didn't use SELinux, but that was before RedHat took interest. RedHat likes making things more secure with SELinux.
-
comment
Comment #13554351
Wouldn't it have been easier to check the audit.log? Pump out the contents to audit2allow and you will have a nice new config that would allow your setup. Heck, it would even tell …
-
comment
Comment #13405527
Did you consult the audit.log? Did you pump it through audit2allow? The audit2allow tool will even tell you if the issue can be fixed by setting a boolean on the SELinux config. Mo…
-
comment
Comment #13405204
I have always run SELinux on Fedora/CentOS/RHEL and I don't remember a time where I had issues with authorized_keys. The only thing recently I recall about ssh is that is complains…