Viewing profile — jeduehr
jeduehr
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Apr 09, 2021, 6:51 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 249
- Public activity
- 90 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jeduehr
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27322621
I especially enjoy reading this from the school newspaper of the University where fun goes to die (my alma mater). :)
-
comment
Comment #27301883
I will say this is something we've known for a while: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27885658/
-
comment
Comment #26763896
Hi, I want to apologize. I was the one who did not see that you from the very beginning said you did not put much stock into the lab theory, and I basically ignored that. I didn't …
-
comment
Comment #26763875
Hi you'll see elsewhere that I was very open about the fact that I, too, think an open and honest investigation from third parties is necessary. Seriously just search this page for…
-
comment
Comment #26762261
Yep, all we can do is estimate probabilities with the extremely limited data on hand.
-
comment
Comment #26761602
And if you actually have been playing "devil's advocate" this whole time and don't believe the interpretation of facts that you've put forth, then that is very much "arguing in bad…
-
comment
Comment #26761500
All of this aside, the actual point I have been making the whole time is this: Do you think these two possibilities are equally likely? Do you think one is more likely than the oth…
-
comment
Comment #26761323
And you also don't have to take my word for it that virologists were concerned! See all these scientific review articles demonstrating that fact: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11…
-
comment
Comment #26761287
And you also don't have to take my word for it re: China's problem with zoonotic transmission. Here are scientific review articles that demonstrate that consensus: https://pubmed.n…
-
comment
Comment #26761004
Also, I just want to reiterate here, we virologists have literally been saying this is going to happen from nature FOR YEARS. People like Michael Osterholm and Peter Daszak and Vin…
-
comment
Comment #26760969
But these are permalinks? This is like linking to a github. It doesn't just "disappear." Unless Reddit goes under, which is just as likely as StackOverflow or HN going under. At th…
-
comment
Comment #26760962
yeah, not in the time frame available or with the tools available. It would either have to be some hidden virus that they all lied about, or somehow an unknown contaminant in their…
-
comment
Comment #26760955
Honestly, can't find it. It was in some random facebook group about this stuff, I joined a couple dozen as the pandemic went on, so hard to find which one and my activity log searc…
-
comment
Comment #26760922
>Everyone knows that mutations that increase transmissability generally hurt morbidity. Is there some reason you think this supports zoonotic hypothesis? It is public knowledge RaT…
-
comment
Comment #26760896
Honestly it's really really hard to say for sure. It's not super likely, because we don't have the epidemiological data (increased deaths from non-influenza pneumonia at a large sc…
-
comment
Comment #26760868
Here are a lot of other experts (and surveys of experts) who agree the lab leak is less likely: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/gk6y95/covid19_did...
-
comment
Comment #26760848
Yes! And that is how most virologists (myself included) feel about this whole thing. Zoonosis is just a lot more likely.
-
comment
Comment #26760839
Hi, you're probably right it isn't possible to know 100% the origin at this point. All we can do is make probabilistic arguments. Inferences. Inductive reasoning. And that sort of …
-
comment
Comment #26760833
Hi, difference is I actually admit these things are possible and have happened before. But this event doesn't look anything like those other lab release events. See here: https://w…
-
comment
Comment #26760825
Best epidemiological and genetic evidence suggests it originated somewhere outside Wuhan and then became a serious outbreak there as it's a major population center. https://www.red…
-
comment
Comment #26760819
Yep, agreed on all 3 counts.
-
comment
Comment #26760811
Also, btw, month at the LONGEST for that ACE2 cloning. An experienced cloner using In-Fusion could probably do it in like a week. Or two weeks.
-
comment
Comment #26760791
>Your comments on mutation rates confirm that RaTG13 is not closely related to COV (we knew that) and imply we should expect to find a closer relative. Yet we haven't. And the pape…
-
comment
Comment #26760319
Sorry I accidentally linked to SH01 in here instead of the korean strain. here's the correct one: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MT039890 And here also is an Australian strai…
- comment