Viewing profile — jdangu
jdangu
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 21, 2011, 2:08 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 415
- Public activity
- 115 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About jdangu
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47482750
Websites routinely access the same urls over and over in a single page session, especially with aggressive ad refresh. Normally you only incur the first request as load, not the su…
-
comment
Comment #47482695
To measure network load, open dev tools, uncheck "disable caches" then clear your browser cache then load the page. Screenshot indicates network cache is disabled so the stated num…
-
comment
Comment #37077790
Since this is taking off, Confiant is hiring in engineering and security to work alongside Kaileigh on projects like this. jerome at confiant. Pardon the plug.
- story
-
comment
Comment #36379911
As someone who authored some keygen templates in this list (circa 1999-2000), this music was not commonly properly sourced. Chip music had already turned classic and we would pick …
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #17899403
Chrome's protection only works in cross-origin iframes [1] and has been in beta for years. I haven't checked in a while but can't find a source that confirms that it went live. For…
-
comment
Comment #16255094
Author here, we don't know their profit, but we estimate that they've spent about $220,000 through 2017, which is fairly cheap if you want to blast 1 billion malverts across the in…
- story
-
comment
Comment #16138139
Anyone has more info on the performance recovery today? We experienced similar performance issues over the last few days with a seemingly complete recovery today (on a cluster of ~…
- story
-
comment
Comment #15146219
Everyone feels the pain: Publisher gets paid on a $1 CPM basis while Cedato gets paid $5-10 CPM and pockets the difference. Advertiser thinks they paid for quality video content pr…
-
comment
Comment #15146107
Ad security is very weak by design because it allows any fourth-party to serve html/javascript on any website. As long as this is the norm, we'll be around to protect publishers an…
-
comment
Comment #15146024
it's fraud.
-
comment
Comment #15145965
That's not the reason, it's ad fraud. They are most likely paid on CPC (cost per click) and forcing clicks in a hidden iframe. Or they are "stuffing cookies" for an affiliation lin…
-
comment
Comment #15145943
Awesome to see that subject #1 on HN. At my startup Confiant [1], we block bad ads in stream on behalf of publishers. Cedato aka Algovid aka TLVMedia is one of our prime targets, w…
-
comment
Comment #15113105
yup, we detect and block most sleazy ad tech schemes through the daisy-chain of third parties. Agreed on UX improvement with ad blockers, we're doing this selectively on behalf of …
-
comment
Comment #15110030
We're doing exactly that at my startup Confiant [1], blocking bad ads in stream on behalf of publishers. High quality content websites don't want to ruin UX with bad ads. [1] https…
-
comment
Comment #13565168
Legohead, my startup blocks just the unsafe ads without revenue impact for the publisher. One of our beta clients plans to reach out to their ad-blocking audience to re-enable ads …
- story